Maria Bartiromo presses Huawei exec on 'back door' allegations subtitles

>> HOW DID HE GET THAT? MARIA: THAT IS AWESOME AND TRUMPMARIA: THAT IS AWESOME AND TRUMP ADMINISTRATION BATTLE AGAINSTADMINISTRATION BATTLE AGAINST CHINESE TELL COME GIANTCHINESE TELL COME GIANT INTENSIFY THIS MORNING THISINTENSIFY THIS MORNING THIS COMESES ON HEELS OF THECOMESES ON HEELS OF THE REVELATION THAT HUAWEIREVELATION THAT HUAWEI REPORTEDLY HAS EVEN MORE ACCESSREPORTEDLY HAS EVEN MORE ACCESS TO INFORMATION POSSIBLY ABOUTTO INFORMATION POSSIBLY ABOUT YOU THAN PREVIOUS WILL THOUGHT.YOU THAN PREVIOUS WILL THOUGHT. INTEL SOURCES SAY BIG KNOWN FORINTEL SOURCES SAY BIG KNOWN FOR YEARS THAT WASHINGTON BUILDSYEARS THAT WASHINGTON BUILDS COVERT ACCESS TO CHINESECOVERT ACCESS TO CHINESE GOVERNMENT AND TO MOBILEGOVERNMENT AND TO MOBILE HARDWARE SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMSHARDWARE SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS KNOWN IN A CYBERWORLD AS BACKKNOWN IN A CYBERWORLD AS BACK DOORS.DOORS. JOINING ME IS CHIEF SECURITYJOINING ME IS CHIEF SECURITY OFFICER AND GREAT TO SEE YOUOFFICER AND GREAT TO SEE YOU THANKS FOR COMING BACK THISSINGTHANKS FOR COMING BACK THISSING MORNING.MORNING. >> SO YOU AND I HAVE HAD THIS>> SO YOU AND I HAVE HAD THIS DISCUSSION OVER AND OVER ABOUTDISCUSSION OVER AND OVER ABOUT BACK DOOR AND I MENTION TO YOUBACK DOOR AND I MENTION TO YOU IN OUR LAST INTERVIEW, IN FACT,IN OUR LAST INTERVIEW, IN FACT, TALKING ABOUT VOTE A PHONETALKING ABOUT VOTE A PHONE TALKING ABOUT --TALKING ABOUT -- WHAT HAPPENED IN AFRICA INWHAT HAPPENED IN AFRICA IN EUROPE WHERE THERE ARE BACKEUROPE WHERE THERE ARE BACK DOORS WITHIN HUAWEI COMMITMENTDOORS WITHIN HUAWEI COMMITMENT THAT ALLOWS THE DATA TO GO RIGHTTHAT ALLOWS THE DATA TO GO RIGHT BACK TO THE COMMUNE FISTBACK TO THE COMMUNE FIST GOVERNMENT.GOVERNMENT. YOU HAVE SAID OVER AND OVER THATYOU HAVE SAID OVER AND OVER THAT IT IS JUST IS NOT TRUE.IT IS JUST IS NOT TRUE. NOW WE HAVE CONFIRMATION FROMNOW WE HAVE CONFIRMATION FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. YOUR REACTION.YOUR REACTION. EFNL WELL I THINK IT ISEFNL WELL I THINK IT IS FANTASTIC NEWS THAT THE UNITEDFANTASTIC NEWS THAT THE UNITED STATES HAVE DECIDED TOSTATES HAVE DECIDED TO DECLASSIFY THIS INFORMATION THATDECLASSIFY THIS INFORMATION THAT THEY’VE BEEN PROVIDING TO OURTHEY’VE BEEN PROVIDING TO OUR ALLIES WITHOUT ABLE TO CONVINCEALLIES WITHOUT ABLE TO CONVINCE THEM SO I WOULD ASK U.S.THEM SO I WOULD ASK U.S. PLEASE --PLEASE -- RELEASE SO-CALLED EVIDENCERELEASE SO-CALLED EVIDENCE BECAUSE AS --BECAUSE AS -- TELL COME AS VOTE GERMANY SAIDTELL COME AS VOTE GERMANY SAID THEY’RE NOT WORRIED.THEY’RE NOT WORRIED. THEY PROVIDE THE COMMITMENTTHEY PROVIDE THE COMMITMENT THAT’S NECESSARY FOR LAWFULTHAT’S NECESSARY FOR LAWFUL INTERCEPT OUR EQUIPMENT DOESN’TINTERCEPT OUR EQUIPMENT DOESN’T DO THAT.DO THAT. WE DO NOT HAVE THAT ACCESS ANDWE DO NOT HAVE THAT ACCESS AND THAT’S THE FACTS AND SO I’VETHAT’S THE FACTS AND SO I’VE ENCOURAGED U.S. GOVERNMENT TOENCOURAGED U.S. GOVERNMENT TO BRING THEIR SO-CALLED EVIDENCEBRING THEIR SO-CALLED EVIDENCE FORWARD.FORWARD. >> WAIT A SENDING WE DO HAVE -->> WAIT A SENDING WE DO HAVE -- WE ACTUALLY DO HAVE EVIDENCE ANDWE ACTUALLY DO HAVE EVIDENCE AND YOU KNOW THAT.YOU KNOW THAT. YOUR COMPANY HAS SETTLED WITHYOUR COMPANY HAS SETTLED WITH NUMBER OF TECHNOLOGY COMPANIESNUMBER OF TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES AS A RESULT OF THIS.AS A RESULT OF THIS. AMONG OTHER PUNISHES NOT TOAMONG OTHER PUNISHES NOT TO MENTION THE THEFT OF INTLEKMENTION THE THEFT OF INTLEK WHICH WILL PROPERTY AND WE KNOWWHICH WILL PROPERTY AND WE KNOW VOTE A PHONE ITALY HAD THISVOTE A PHONE ITALY HAD THIS ISSUE VOTE A VOTE ITALY FOUNDISSUE VOTE A VOTE ITALY FOUND OUT THAT THEY WERE BACK DOORSOUT THAT THEY WERE BACK DOORS AND THEN THEY HAD TO RAISE THEIRAND THEN THEY HAD TO RAISE THEIR HAND, TELL HUAWEI EXECUTIVESHAND, TELL HUAWEI EXECUTIVES THEY’RE A BACK DOOR HERE AND DIDTHEY’RE A BACK DOOR HERE AND DID SOME KIND OF ADJUSTMENT YOU SAIDSOME KIND OF ADJUSTMENT YOU SAID YOU CHANGED BACK DOOR SO WEYOU CHANGED BACK DOOR SO WE ACTUALLY DO INDEED HAVE EVIDENCEACTUALLY DO INDEED HAVE EVIDENCE THAT THERE ARE BACK DOORSES ANDYTHAT THERE ARE BACK DOORSES ANDY AND YOU KNOW THAT.AND YOU KNOW THAT. YOU’RE THE CHIEF SECURITYYOU’RE THE CHIEF SECURITY OFFICER.OFFICER. >> LAST TIME I WAS ON YOUR SHOW>> LAST TIME I WAS ON YOUR SHOW I ENCOURAGE YOU AND OFFERED YOUI ENCOURAGE YOU AND OFFERED YOU TO LET YOU USE MY PHONE AND VOTETO LET YOU USE MY PHONE AND VOTE IS A PHONE ITALY BECAUSE VOTE AIS A PHONE ITALY BECAUSE VOTE A PHONE ITALY DOES NOT BELIEVEPHONE ITALY DOES NOT BELIEVE THAT HUAWEI HAD BACK DOORS THEYTHAT HUAWEI HAD BACK DOORS THEY DO NOT BELIEVE THAT WHAT YOUDO NOT BELIEVE THAT WHAT YOU JUST SAID IS TRUE.JUST SAID IS TRUE. BUT THE GREAT THING IS, THATBUT THE GREAT THING IS, THAT U.S. GOVERNMENT HAS SO-CALLEDU.S. GOVERNMENT HAS SO-CALLED DECLASSIFIED THIS NEWDECLASSIFIED THIS NEW EVIDENCE --EVIDENCE -- AS THEY CONTINUE TO TRY TO COMEAS THEY CONTINUE TO TRY TO COME UP WITH A SMOKING WHICH THEYUP WITH A SMOKING WHICH THEY DON’T HAVE CANT YOU JOIN MEDON’T HAVE CANT YOU JOIN ME MARIA AND ASKING THAT U.S.MARIA AND ASKING THAT U.S. GOVERNMENT TO RELEASE THISGOVERNMENT TO RELEASE THIS UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION.UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION. >> I DON’T NEED TO SEE ANY>> I DON’T NEED TO SEE ANY UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION.UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION. I’VE ALREADY HEARD FROM THEI’VE ALREADY HEARD FROM THE COMPANIES AND THEIR CEOS.COMPANIES AND THEIR CEOS. MANY TIMES ANDY AND WHEN I LOOKMANY TIMES ANDY AND WHEN I LOOK AT VOTE A PHONE THE REASON THATAT VOTE A PHONE THE REASON THAT VOTE A TONE IS NOWEN A NEUTRALVOTE A TONE IS NOWEN A NEUTRAL LEVEL IS BECAUSE YOU SETTLEDLEVEL IS BECAUSE YOU SETTLED WITH THEM.WITH THEM. AND A THE SETTLEMENTS ENSUREAND A THE SETTLEMENTS ENSURE THAT THEY HAVE TO SEES ASIS ANDTHAT THEY HAVE TO SEES ASIS AND NOT DISCUSS THE CASE ANYMORE.NOT DISCUSS THE CASE ANYMORE. >> VOTE A PHONE HAS SAID>> VOTE A PHONE HAS SAID PUBLICLY IN THE --PUBLICLY IN THE -- RECENTLY EVEN RESPONSE TO WALLRECENTLY EVEN RESPONSE TO WALL STREET JOURNAL ARTICLE THEY ARESTREET JOURNAL ARTICLE THEY ARE NOT WORRIED.NOT WORRIED. THAT THEY PROVIDE THE EQUIPMENTTHAT THEY PROVIDE THE EQUIPMENT THAT ALLOWS THE LAWFUL INTERCEPTTHAT ALLOWS THE LAWFUL INTERCEPT FROM OUR EQUIPMENT.FROM OUR EQUIPMENT. WE DON’T PROVIDE THAT EQUIPMENTWE DON’T PROVIDE THAT EQUIPMENT WITHOUT THEIR EQUIPMENT THEREWITHOUT THEIR EQUIPMENT THERE CAN BE NO ACCESS SO ACCESS TOCAN BE NO ACCESS SO ACCESS TO PERMISSION.PERMISSION. HERE’S A STORY THAT I HAVE INHERE’S A STORY THAT I HAVE IN FRONT OF ME FROM PLC.FRONT OF ME FROM PLC. VOTE A PHONE GROUP PLC HASVOTE A PHONE GROUP PLC HAS ACKNOWLEDGEDACKNOWLEDGED ACKNOWLEDGE IT HAS FOUNDACKNOWLEDGE IT HAS FOUND VULNERABLES BACK FOR YEARS BYVULNERABLES BACK FOR YEARS BY BASED HUAWEI FOR THE CARRIERBASED HUAWEI FOR THE CARRIER ITALIAN BUSINESS WHILE VOTE AITALIAN BUSINESS WHILE VOTE A PHONE SAYS ISSUES WERE RESOLVEDPHONE SAYS ISSUES WERE RESOLVED REVELATION MAY FURTHER DAMAGEREVELATION MAY FURTHER DAMAGE THE REPUTATION OF A MAJOR SYMBOLTHE REPUTATION OF A MAJOR SYMBOL OF CHINESE GLOBAL TECHNOLOGYOF CHINESE GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY PARALYSIS.PARALYSIS. THIS IS A BLOOMBERG STORY WHYTHIS IS A BLOOMBERG STORY WHY DON’T YOU GRADE SCHOOL IT?DON’T YOU GRADE SCHOOL IT? >> ALL EQUIPMENT HAS>> ALL EQUIPMENT HAS VULNERABILITIES.VULNERABILITIES. THAT’S DIFFERENT THAN ANTHAT’S DIFFERENT THAN AN INTENTIONAL MALICIOUS BACK DOORINTENTIONAL MALICIOUS BACK DOOR MARCH WHY AND YOU KNOW THAT.MARCH WHY AND YOU KNOW THAT. ENING ALL EQUIPMENT HASENING ALL EQUIPMENT HAS VULNERABILITY?VULNERABILITY? ALL EQUIPMENT DOES NOT HAVE BACKALL EQUIPMENT DOES NOT HAVE BACK DOORS TO THE CHINESE COMMUNEDOORS TO THE CHINESE COMMUNE FIST GOVERNMENT.FIST GOVERNMENT. WHY DO YOU HAVE SO MANY BACKWHY DO YOU HAVE SO MANY BACK DOORS GOING TO THE CHINESEDOORS GOING TO THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT THAT THE COMMUNE FISTGOVERNMENT THAT THE COMMUNE FIST GOVERNMENT SO THAT ANYBODY DATAGOVERNMENT SO THAT ANYBODY DATA IS OUT THERE AND GOES RIGHT BACKIS OUT THERE AND GOES RIGHT BACK TO THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT?TO THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT? WE KNOW THIS HUAWEI IS A CHINESEWE KNOW THIS HUAWEI IS A CHINESE COMPANY IF YOU CAN’T GO AGAINSTCOMPANY IF YOU CAN’T GO AGAINST CHINA RULE ARE YOU GOING TO SAYCHINA RULE ARE YOU GOING TO SAY TO XI JINPING WE’RE NOT GOING TOTO XI JINPING WE’RE NOT GOING TO PUT A BACK DOOR ON THIS AND GOPUT A BACK DOOR ON THIS AND GO UP AGAINST THAT EVEN THOUGH WEUP AGAINST THAT EVEN THOUGH WE KNOW CHINESE ECONOMIES HAVE TOKNOW CHINESE ECONOMIES HAVE TO LIST TO COMMUNE FIST GOVERNMENTLIST TO COMMUNE FIST GOVERNMENT OF CHINA?OF CHINA? >> ABSOLUTELY.>> ABSOLUTELY. AND UNFORTUNATELY WHEN YOU LOOKAND UNFORTUNATELY WHEN YOU LOOK AT THIS SITUATION, LOOK AT IT INAT THIS SITUATION, LOOK AT IT IN A MACRO SENSE THAT YIET ISA MACRO SENSE THAT YIET IS TRYING TO HURT CHINA BY HURTINGTRYING TO HURT CHINA BY HURTING WAY.WAY. CLEARLY, THE UNITED STATES ISCLEARLY, THE UNITED STATES IS HURTING AMERICA MORE THAN IT ISHURTING AMERICA MORE THAN IT IS HURTING WAY AND UNITED STATESHURTING WAY AND UNITED STATES WILL NOT THINK THIS PASSIONATELYWILL NOT THINK THIS PASSIONATELY ABOUT WHAT IS MOST IMPORTANT TOABOUT WHAT IS MOST IMPORTANT TO THE UNITED STATES IN MATERIALSTHE UNITED STATES IN MATERIALS OF THE COMPETITION WITHIN CHINA.OF THE COMPETITION WITHIN CHINA. UNITED STATES WILL NOT CREATE AUNITED STATES WILL NOT CREATE A TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION POLICY.TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION POLICY. THEY WILL NOT --THEY WILL NOT -- >> ANDY, ANDY -->> ANDY, ANDY -- CHAIRMAN OF YOUR COMPANY --CHAIRMAN OF YOUR COMPANY -- COME ON ANDY.COME ON ANDY. PLEASE.PLEASE. AND CHAIRMAN OF YOUR COMPANY --AND CHAIRMAN OF YOUR COMPANY -- 00 COMPANIES TO SETTLE HUAWEI.00 COMPANIES TO SETTLE HUAWEI. THE CHAIRMAN OF YOUR COMPANY ISTHE CHAIRMAN OF YOUR COMPANY IS A MEMBER OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY,A MEMBER OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY, CORRECT?CORRECT? WE CAN PUT IN --WE CAN PUT IN -- HOW MANY BOARD MEMBERS ON HUAWEIHOW MANY BOARD MEMBERS ON HUAWEI BOARD ARE MEMBERS OF THEBOARD ARE MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY?COMMUNIST PARTY? FIVE?FIVE? >> I HAVE NO IDEA MARIA BUT WE>> I HAVE NO IDEA MARIA BUT WE CAN PUT IT AND PROVE THAT OURCAN PUT IT AND PROVE THAT OUR EQUIPMENT IS NOT SUBJECT TO ANYEQUIPMENT IS NOT SUBJECT TO ANY INFLUENCE FOR THE CHINAINFLUENCE FOR THE CHINA GOVERNMENT AND WE CAN PROVEGOVERNMENT AND WE CAN PROVE SO --SO -- >> HOW DO YOU PROVE THAT BECAUSE>> HOW DO YOU PROVE THAT BECAUSE I’VE GOT THIS RIGHT HERE.I’VE GOT THIS RIGHT HERE. EUROPE BIGGEST PHONE COMPANYEUROPE BIGGEST PHONE COMPANY IDENTIFY HIS OPINION BACK DOORIDENTIFY HIS OPINION BACK DOOR IN SOFTWARE THAT COULD HAVEIN SOFTWARE THAT COULD HAVE GIVEN HUAWEI UNTHORSZED ACCESSGIVEN HUAWEI UNTHORSZED ACCESS TO CARRIERS FIXED LINE NETWORK ATO CARRIERS FIXED LINE NETWORK A SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES INTERNETSYSTEM THAT PROVIDES INTERNET SERVICE TO L HL HADS HOME IT PRESERVICE TO L HL HADS HOME IT PRE CLEAR THAT HUAWEI WANTS TO SETCLEAR THAT HUAWEI WANTS TO SET UP INFRASTRUCTURE IN ALL OF THEUP INFRASTRUCTURE IN ALL OF THE AS MANY COUNTRIES AS WILL ALLOWAS MANY COUNTRIES AS WILL ALLOW BY GIVING THEM CHEAPBY GIVING THEM CHEAP INFRASTRUCTURE SO THEY HAVE BACKINFRASTRUCTURE SO THEY HAVE BACK DOOR INTO ALL OF THIS HAD DATADOOR INTO ALL OF THIS HAD DATA AND CHINESE COMMUNIST GOVERNMENTAND CHINESE COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT CAN STEAL DA A TAY AND GETCAN STEAL DA A TAY AND GET SMARTER IN TERMS HOW OTHERS ARESMARTER IN TERMS HOW OTHERS ARE DOING THEIR BUSINESS WHATEVER ITDOING THEIR BUSINESS WHATEVER IT IS THAT COMMUNIST GOVERNMENTIS THAT COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT WANTS THIS DATA FOR.WANTS THIS DATA FOR. >> APPARENTLY MOST THE WORLD>> APPARENTLY MOST THE WORLD DOESN’T AGREE WITH YOU ANDDOESN’T AGREE WITH YOU AND BELIEVE THERE’S SUCH EVIDENCE.BELIEVE THERE’S SUCH EVIDENCE. WE HAVE TESTING MECHANISMS INWE HAVE TESTING MECHANISMS IN PLACE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM INPLACE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM IN BOND IN BRUSSELS IN CANADA WHEREBOND IN BRUSSELS IN CANADA WHERE THE EQUIPMENT CAN BE TESTED.THE EQUIPMENT CAN BE TESTED. THE FORMER DEPUTY FOR DNI SAIDTHE FORMER DEPUTY FOR DNI SAID WE CAN FIND BACK DOOR AND WEWE CAN FIND BACK DOOR AND WE HAVE MECHANISMS IN PLACE FORHAVE MECHANISMS IN PLACE FOR ACCESSING DATA WE CAN PROVE THATACCESSING DATA WE CAN PROVE THAT OUR DATA IS ONLY SUBJECT TO --OUR DATA IS ONLY SUBJECT TO -- SUBJECT TO TOTAL CONTROL BY THESUBJECT TO TOTAL CONTROL BY THE CARRIERS, EVERY KEY STROKE THATCARRIERS, EVERY KEY STROKE THAT WE ACCESS IS RECORDED.WE ACCESS IS RECORDED. THEY KNOW WHETHER --THEY KNOW WHETHER -- WHAT WE ACCESS AND THEY KNOWWHAT WE ACCESS AND THEY KNOW WHAT WE DO WITH IT AND PROVEWHAT WE DO WITH IT AND PROVE WE’RE NOT SUBJECT TO THE PICKETWE’RE NOT SUBJECT TO THE PICKET POINT OF THE CHINA GOVERNMENT.POINT OF THE CHINA GOVERNMENT. >> YOU HAVE CHINESE COMMUNESSIST>> YOU HAVE CHINESE COMMUNESSIST ON BOARD AND RUNNING COMPANY.ON BOARD AND RUNNING COMPANY. CHAIRL OF THE BOARD --CHAIRL OF THE BOARD -- IS A MEMBER OF THE COMMUNISTIS A MEMBER OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY YOU HAVE SEVERAL BOARDPARTY YOU HAVE SEVERAL BOARD MEMBERS THAT ARE MEMBERSMEMBERS THAT ARE MEMBERS OFFICIAL MEMBERS OF THE CHINESEOFFICIAL MEMBERS OF THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY ANDY.COMMUNIST PARTY ANDY. YOU SHOULD KNOW THIS AND I KNOWYOU SHOULD KNOW THIS AND I KNOW YOU DO KNOW THIS BECAUSE YOU’REYOU DO KNOW THIS BECAUSE YOU’RE THE CHIEF SECURITY OFFICER.THE CHIEF SECURITY OFFICER. BUT MARIA, YOU’RE NOT LISTENBUT MARIA, YOU’RE NOT LISTEN HADDING TO WHAT I’M SAYING IHADDING TO WHAT I’M SAYING I KNOW YOU THINK YOU ARE BUTKNOW YOU THINK YOU ARE BUT YOU’RE NOT.YOU’RE NOT. THE FACT IS THERE ARE MECHANISMSTHE FACT IS THERE ARE MECHANISMS IN PLACE WHERE INDEPENDENTIN PLACE WHERE INDEPENDENT EXPERTS CAN TEST THE SOFTWAREEXPERTS CAN TEST THE SOFTWARE FOR VULNERABILITIES, AND CANFOR VULNERABILITIES, AND CAN TEST FOR BACK DOORS, ANDTEST FOR BACK DOORS, AND REGARDING THE --REGARDING THE -- THE UPDATES TO THE EQUIPMENT,THE UPDATES TO THE EQUIPMENT, INDEPENDENT EXPERTS CAN EVALUATEINDEPENDENT EXPERTS CAN EVALUATE UPDATES TO MAKE A SUREST THEREUPDATES TO MAKE A SUREST THERE IS NO IMPROPER ACCESS BY HUAWEIIS NO IMPROPER ACCESS BY HUAWEI TO ANY CUSTOMER.TO ANY CUSTOMER. >> WHERE WERE THESE INDEPENDENT>> WHERE WERE THESE INDEPENDENT EXPERT WHEN VOTE A PHONEEXPERT WHEN VOTE A PHONE FOUNDING BACK OR DOORS WHEREFOUNDING BACK OR DOORS WHERE WERE THESE INABOUT DEPENDENTWERE THESE INABOUT DEPENDENT EXPERTS WHEN OTHERS THROUGHOUTEXPERTS WHEN OTHERS THROUGHOUT EUROPE WITH AND AFRICA FOUNDINGEUROPE WITH AND AFRICA FOUNDING BACK DOORSES AFTER YOU STALLEDBACK DOORSES AFTER YOU STALLED IN FREE AFRICA NATIONS WHEREIN FREE AFRICA NATIONS WHERE WERE THESE INDEPENDENT AND WHOWERE THESE INDEPENDENT AND WHO ARE THESE I WOULD LIKE TO HAVEARE THESE I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THEM ON THE SHOW.THEM ON THE SHOW. >> SURE, I’LL GET YOU NAMES OF>> SURE, I’LL GET YOU NAMES OF COMPANIES.COMPANIES. >> TELL ME NOW -->> TELL ME NOW -- >> NO NAMES OFF THE TOP OF MY>> NO NAMES OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD I’M SORRY.HEAD I’M SORRY. >> LET ME ASK YOU THIS BECAUSE>> LET ME ASK YOU THIS BECAUSE PENTAGON SET TO BACK NEW U.S.PENTAGON SET TO BACK NEW U.S. RESTRICTION ISES ON HUAWEI ANDRESTRICTION ISES ON HUAWEI AND PUTT ON EXPERTS HOW HAS THATPUTT ON EXPERTS HOW HAS THAT IMPACTED COMPANY ANDY?IMPACTED COMPANY ANDY? >> I’M SORRY MISSED FIRST PART>> I’M SORRY MISSED FIRST PART OF YOUR QUESTION.OF YOUR QUESTION. >> WELL L WE HAVE NOW NEW>> WELL L WE HAVE NOW NEW RESTRICTIONS ON HUAWEIRESTRICTIONS ON HUAWEI EQUIPMENT.EQUIPMENT. HOW IS IT IMPACTED YOUR COMPANY?HOW IS IT IMPACTED YOUR COMPANY? THE PENTAGON IS SET TO BACK NEWTHE PENTAGON IS SET TO BACK NEW RESTRICTIONS ON HUAWEIRESTRICTIONS ON HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES.TECHNOLOGIES. >> WELL, THERE ARE TWO ISSUES>> WELL, THERE ARE TWO ISSUES THIS IS ABILITY TO SELL IN WHICHTHIS IS ABILITY TO SELL IN WHICH YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT IS ABILITYYOU’RE TALKING ABOUT IS ABILITY OF UP TO 300 COMPANIESES ONE ISOF UP TO 300 COMPANIESES ONE IS SELL TO HUAWEI.SELL TO HUAWEI. THE DEPARTMENT OF THE DEFENSETHE DEPARTMENT OF THE DEFENSE THAT INTERPOSED RULE TO FURTHERTHAT INTERPOSED RULE TO FURTHER LIMIT ABILITY OF AMERICANLIMIT ABILITY OF AMERICAN COMPANIESCOMPANIES SELL TO HUAWEI WE PURCHASE ABOUTSELL TO HUAWEI WE PURCHASE ABOUT 11 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR AND11 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR AND FACT IS AND I’VE COME BACK FROMFACT IS AND I’VE COME BACK FROM DETAIL MEETINGS, IT IS CLEARDETAIL MEETINGS, IT IS CLEAR THAT WHILE THE IMPACT ON HUAWEITHAT WHILE THE IMPACT ON HUAWEI WILL BE AN IMPACT OF THE FACTWILL BE AN IMPACT OF THE FACT THAT WE CAN’T BUY THOSETHAT WE CAN’T BUY THOSE TECHNOLOGIES.TECHNOLOGIES. AND WE WOULD LIKE TO COME BACKAND WE WOULD LIKE TO COME BACK TO BUY THEM.TO BUY THEM. BUT WHAT IS CERTAIN IS, WE’REBUT WHAT IS CERTAIN IS, WE’RE GOING TO BE FINE OUR PLAN BGOING TO BE FINE OUR PLAN B ISING WORKING WELL AND WE’REISING WORKING WELL AND WE’RE INCREDITTEDDABLY SUCCESSFUL EVENINCREDITTEDDABLY SUCCESSFUL EVEN IF WE DON’T BUY FROM AMERICANIF WE DON’T BUY FROM AMERICAN COMPANIESES AND HAD AMERICA ISCOMPANIESES AND HAD AMERICA IS GOING TO LOSE.GOING TO LOSE. U.S. HAS TO THINK ABOUT WHAT ISU.S. HAS TO THINK ABOUT WHAT IS GOING TO BENEFIT THE U.S. THEGOING TO BENEFIT THE U.S. THE MOST.MOST. CONSEQUENCES OF THESE DECISIONSCONSEQUENCES OF THESE DECISIONS AND WHAT KIND OF LITIGATION TOAND WHAT KIND OF LITIGATION TO BE PUT IN PLACE.BE PUT IN PLACE. >> DISCUSSIONS NEED TO BE HAD.>> DISCUSSIONS NEED TO BE HAD. >> YOU KNOW -->> YOU KNOW -- WHAT SIZZLE FUSION IS --WHAT SIZZLE FUSION IS -- WHERE ANY TECHNOLOGY GOING INTOWHERE ANY TECHNOLOGY GOING INTO CHINA HAS TO FIRST GO TO THECHINA HAS TO FIRST GO TO THE MILITARY.MILITARY. YOU KNOW THAT CHINESEYOU KNOW THAT CHINESE ASPIRATIONS TO BE THE NUMBER ONEASPIRATIONS TO BE THE NUMBER ONE SUPERPOWER IN THE WORLD BOTHSUPERPOWER IN THE WORLD BOTH ECONOMICALLY AND A MILITARILY.ECONOMICALLY AND A MILITARILY. YOUR PRODUCTS ARE ENABLE AINGYOUR PRODUCTS ARE ENABLE AING OTHER COMPANIES IF TO ALLOWOTHER COMPANIES IF TO ALLOW ACCESS INTO THEIR DATA SO THATACCESS INTO THEIR DATA SO THAT THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT CAN HAVETHE CHINESE GOVERNMENT CAN HAVE THOSE GOALS AND ACHIEVE THOSETHOSE GOALS AND ACHIEVE THOSE GOALS.GOALS. IT IS VERY CLEAR AND NOW MOREIT IS VERY CLEAR AND NOW MORE PEOPLE KNOW THIS.PEOPLE KNOW THIS. SECRETARY POMPEO JUST GAVE ASECRETARY POMPEO JUST GAVE A SPEECH LAST WEEK TO THESPEECH LAST WEEK TO THE GOVERNORS ABOUT WHAT CHINESEGOVERNORS ABOUT WHAT CHINESE GOVERNMENT ISING DOING AND YOURGOVERNMENT ISING DOING AND YOUR COMPANY IS IN ARM OF THE CHINESECOMPANY IS IN ARM OF THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT.GOVERNMENT. YOU CANNOT GO AGAINST THEYOU CANNOT GO AGAINST THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT AND SAY WE’RECHINESE GOVERNMENT AND SAY WE’RE NOT GOING TO HAVE A BACK DOOR.NOT GOING TO HAVE A BACK DOOR. WE’RE NOT GOING TO GIVE ACCESSWE’RE NOT GOING TO GIVE ACCESS SO THAT DATA GOES BACK TOSO THAT DATA GOES BACK TO CHINESE GOVERNMENTS.CHINESE GOVERNMENTS. IT’S AGAINST THE LAW.IT’S AGAINST THE LAW. YOU’RE GOING TO GO FIGHT WITH XIYOU’RE GOING TO GO FIGHT WITH XI JINPING ON THIS?JINPING ON THIS? >> EXPERTS, KNOW THAT WE CAN>> EXPERTS, KNOW THAT WE CAN TEST INDEPENDENT EXPERTS CANTEST INDEPENDENT EXPERTS CAN TEST BACK DOOR.TEST BACK DOOR. >> HOW DO YOU TEST AND GIVE US>> HOW DO YOU TEST AND GIVE US WHAT ARE THE TESTS?WHAT ARE THE TESTS? DGES TALK TO MAIN FOR EXAMPLEDGES TALK TO MAIN FOR EXAMPLE WHEN THEY DO A COMPLETE BREAKWHEN THEY DO A COMPLETE BREAK DOWN OF THE CODE.DOWN OF THE CODE. WHY DO YOU THINK ERICKSON AREWHY DO YOU THINK ERICKSON ARE ALLOWED TO DO BUSINESS IN UNITEDALLOWED TO DO BUSINESS IN UNITED STATES DESPITE THEIR DEEP TIESSTATES DESPITE THEIR DEEP TIES TO CHINA INCLUDING DEEP TIES TOTO CHINA INCLUDING DEEP TIES TO THE CHINA GOVERNMENT BECAUSETHE CHINA GOVERNMENT BECAUSE THERE’S A GOVERNMENT MONITOREDTHERE’S A GOVERNMENT MONITORED RISK MITIGATION INCLUDINGRISK MITIGATION INCLUDING INDEPENDENT TESTING OF THEINDEPENDENT TESTING OF THE PRODUCTS.PRODUCTS. WE WANT TO TALK ABOUT THAT --WE WANT TO TALK ABOUT THAT -- WITH THE U.S. GOVERNMENT.WITH THE U.S. GOVERNMENT. >> SETTLE WITH 10 PLUS COMPANIES>> SETTLE WITH 10 PLUS COMPANIES IN TERMS OF INTELLECTUAL FACTIN TERMS OF INTELLECTUAL FACT WHY ALL OF THE SETTLEMENT?WHY ALL OF THE SETTLEMENT? CISCO ERICKSON ACROSS THE BOARD,CISCO ERICKSON ACROSS THE BOARD, AMERICAN COMPANIES HAVE SAIDAMERICAN COMPANIES HAVE SAID MICROSOFT WE HAVE FORMER CEOENMICROSOFT WE HAVE FORMER CEOEN THIS PROGRAM SAYING THAT THEFTTHIS PROGRAM SAYING THAT THEFT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FROMOF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FROM CHINA COST THE COMPANY TENS OFCHINA COST THE COMPANY TENS OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS EVERY YEAR.BILLIONS OF DOLLARS EVERY YEAR. WHY ALL A OF THE SETTLEMENT ANDWHY ALL A OF THE SETTLEMENT AND THEN THOSE SETTLEMENTS INCLUDETHEN THOSE SETTLEMENTS INCLUDE ASSIST LETTER TO THOSE CEO SAYASSIST LETTER TO THOSE CEO SAY YOU CAN NOT DISCUSS WHAT JUSTYOU CAN NOT DISCUSS WHAT JUST WENT ON.WENT ON. >> BUT MARIALET BE FAIR LET’S>> BUT MARIALET BE FAIR LET’S LOOK AT THE HISTORY OF THATLOOK AT THE HISTORY OF THAT INDUSTRY IS THATINDUSTRY IS THAT TELECOMMUNICATION MOBILETELECOMMUNICATION MOBILE INDUSTRY.INDUSTRY. LET’S LOOK AT THE NUMBER --LET’S LOOK AT THE NUMBER -- HISTORY OF THE INDUSTRY BUTHISTORY OF THE INDUSTRY BUT LOOKING AT HUAWEI TECHNOLOGYLOOKING AT HUAWEI TECHNOLOGY THAT ALLOW DATA BACK TO CHINESETHAT ALLOW DATA BACK TO CHINESE GOVERNMENT AND I’M LOOKING ATGOVERNMENT AND I’M LOOKING AT THE INTELLECTUAL THEFT THATTHE INTELLECTUAL THEFT THAT HUAWEI HAS DONE ON ALL A OFHUAWEI HAS DONE ON ALL A OF THESE TELL COME COMPANIES.THESE TELL COME COMPANIES. WHAT IS HUAWEI ANYWAY?WHAT IS HUAWEI ANYWAY? HUAWEI BEGAN BECAUSE IT WAS --HUAWEI BEGAN BECAUSE IT WAS -- THE BEGINNINGS OF THE CANADIANTHE BEGINNINGS OF THE CANADIAN COMPANY WHICH YOU CHANGE NAMECOMPANY WHICH YOU CHANGE NAME OF.OF. NOT YOU BUT YOUR --NOT YOU BUT YOUR -- YOUR EXECUTIVES CHANGE NAME OF,YOUR EXECUTIVES CHANGE NAME OF, AND BECAME HUAWEI THAT WASAND BECAME HUAWEI THAT WAS ACTUALLY CANADIAN COMPANY.ACTUALLY CANADIAN COMPANY. CONSIDER LET’S GET THE EVIDENCECONSIDER LET’S GET THE EVIDENCE RERELEASED ON THIS MAJORRERELEASED ON THIS MAJOR ALLEGATION BY THE U.S.ALLEGATION BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT.GOVERNMENT. THEY WILL NOT RELEASE THETHEY WILL NOT RELEASE THE INFORMATION BECAUSE THEY DOINFORMATION BECAUSE THEY DO NOT --NOT -- >> THEY’RE RELEASING IT EVERY>> THEY’RE RELEASING IT EVERY DAY SECRETARY POMPEO WAS TALKINGDAY SECRETARY POMPEO WAS TALKING TO ALL OF THE GOVERNORS LASTTO ALL OF THE GOVERNORS LAST WEEK HE’S BEEN ON THIS SETWEEK HE’S BEEN ON THIS SET TALKING TO ME ABOUT THE RISKSTALKING TO ME ABOUT THE RISKS AROUND HUAWEI.AROUND HUAWEI. THE PRESIDENT WHILE DOING ATHE PRESIDENT WHILE DOING A TRADE DEAL IS ALSO TELLINGTRADE DEAL IS ALSO TELLING EVERYBODY IN AMERICA THE RISKSESEVERYBODY IN AMERICA THE RISKSES AROUND HUAWEI TOO IF YOU WANT TOAROUND HUAWEI TOO IF YOU WANT TO DO BUSINESS WITH HUAWEI DO ITDO BUSINESS WITH HUAWEI DO IT WITH YOUR EYES OPEN BECAUSEWITH YOUR EYES OPEN BECAUSE THEY’LL STEAL AND CHEAT ANDTHEY’LL STEAL AND CHEAT AND THEY’LL HAVE OPEN DOORS TOTHEY’LL HAVE OPEN DOORS TO CHINESE GOVERNMENT.CHINESE GOVERNMENT. WE KNOW THIS ANDY.WE KNOW THIS ANDY. >> FORTUNATELY THE U.K.>> FORTUNATELY THE U.K. GOVERNMENT HAS SAID THEY WANT TOGOVERNMENT HAS SAID THEY WANT TO TAKE AN EVIDENCE-BASED APPROACHTAKE AN EVIDENCE-BASED APPROACH AS CLOSEST ALLIES, THEY AREAS CLOSEST ALLIES, THEY ARE REJECTING WHAT THE U.S. SAYS.REJECTING WHAT THE U.S. SAYS. AND THERE’S A REASON FOR THAT.AND THERE’S A REASON FOR THAT. AND WHILE THEY TALK IN THE HIGHAND WHILE THEY TALK IN THE HIGH LEVEL MATERIALS ABOUT THIS MOSTLEVEL MATERIALS ABOUT THIS MOST RECENT ALLEGATION, THEY WILL NOTRECENT ALLEGATION, THEY WILL NOT PRODUCE FACTS THAT DEMONSTRATEPRODUCE FACTS THAT DEMONSTRATE THEY’RE CORRECT.THEY’RE CORRECT. I HOPE YOU CAN BRING SOME OFI HOPE YOU CAN BRING SOME OF THAT EVIDENCE WITH YOU BECAUSETHAT EVIDENCE WITH YOU BECAUSE WE WOULD ALL LIKE TO SEE IT ANDWE WOULD ALL LIKE TO SEE IT AND ALL OF THIS EVIDENCE THAT YOU’RE

Maria Bartiromo presses Huawei exec on 'back door' allegations

View online
< ?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><>
<text sub="clublinks" start="1.436" dur="2.133">>> HOW DID HE GET THAT? MARIA: THAT IS AWESOME AND TRUMP</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="3.571" dur="2.001">MARIA: THAT IS AWESOME AND TRUMP ADMINISTRATION BATTLE AGAINST</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="5.573" dur="0.966">ADMINISTRATION BATTLE AGAINST CHINESE TELL COME GIANT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="6.541" dur="1.099">CHINESE TELL COME GIANT INTENSIFY THIS MORNING THIS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="7.642" dur="1.033">INTENSIFY THIS MORNING THIS COMESES ON HEELS OF THE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="8.676" dur="1.567">COMESES ON HEELS OF THE REVELATION THAT HUAWEI</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="10.244" dur="2.001">REVELATION THAT HUAWEI REPORTEDLY HAS EVEN MORE ACCESS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="12.246" dur="1.534">REPORTEDLY HAS EVEN MORE ACCESS TO INFORMATION POSSIBLY ABOUT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="13.814" dur="2.068">TO INFORMATION POSSIBLY ABOUT YOU THAN PREVIOUS WILL THOUGHT.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="15.883" dur="1.434">YOU THAN PREVIOUS WILL THOUGHT. INTEL SOURCES SAY BIG KNOWN FOR</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="17.351" dur="2.702">INTEL SOURCES SAY BIG KNOWN FOR YEARS THAT WASHINGTON BUILDS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="20.054" dur="1.3">YEARS THAT WASHINGTON BUILDS COVERT ACCESS TO CHINESE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="21.355" dur="1.234">COVERT ACCESS TO CHINESE GOVERNMENT AND TO MOBILE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="22.623" dur="1.134">GOVERNMENT AND TO MOBILE HARDWARE SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="23.791" dur="1.701">HARDWARE SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS KNOWN IN A CYBERWORLD AS BACK</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="25.493" dur="2.568">KNOWN IN A CYBERWORLD AS BACK DOORS.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="28.062" dur="3.236">DOORS. JOINING ME IS CHIEF SECURITY</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="31.332" dur="1.167">JOINING ME IS CHIEF SECURITY OFFICER AND GREAT TO SEE YOU</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="32.5" dur="1.234">OFFICER AND GREAT TO SEE YOU THANKS FOR COMING BACK THISSING</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="33.768" dur="0.333">THANKS FOR COMING BACK THISSING MORNING.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="34.102" dur="1.8">MORNING. >> SO YOU AND I HAVE HAD THIS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="35.904" dur="1.466">>> SO YOU AND I HAVE HAD THIS DISCUSSION OVER AND OVER ABOUT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="37.372" dur="0.933">DISCUSSION OVER AND OVER ABOUT BACK DOOR AND I MENTION TO YOU</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="38.34" dur="1.7">BACK DOOR AND I MENTION TO YOU IN OUR LAST INTERVIEW, IN FACT,</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="40.074" dur="1.034">IN OUR LAST INTERVIEW, IN FACT, TALKING ABOUT VOTE A PHONE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="41.142" dur="1.467">TALKING ABOUT VOTE A PHONE TALKING ABOUT --</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="42.611" dur="2.133">TALKING ABOUT -- WHAT HAPPENED IN AFRICA IN</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="44.779" dur="2.134">WHAT HAPPENED IN AFRICA IN EUROPE WHERE THERE ARE BACK</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="46.915" dur="2.001">EUROPE WHERE THERE ARE BACK DOORS WITHIN HUAWEI COMMITMENT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="48.917" dur="2.001">DOORS WITHIN HUAWEI COMMITMENT THAT ALLOWS THE DATA TO GO RIGHT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="50.919" dur="1.2">THAT ALLOWS THE DATA TO GO RIGHT BACK TO THE COMMUNE FIST</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="52.154" dur="0.365">BACK TO THE COMMUNE FIST GOVERNMENT.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="52.52" dur="1.4">GOVERNMENT. YOU HAVE SAID OVER AND OVER THAT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="53.922" dur="1.8">YOU HAVE SAID OVER AND OVER THAT IT IS JUST IS NOT TRUE.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="55.724" dur="0.866">IT IS JUST IS NOT TRUE. NOW WE HAVE CONFIRMATION FROM</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="56.624" dur="0.8">NOW WE HAVE CONFIRMATION FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="57.458" dur="1.401">THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. YOUR REACTION.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="58.893" dur="1.501">YOUR REACTION. EFNL WELL I THINK IT IS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="60.395" dur="1.734">EFNL WELL I THINK IT IS FANTASTIC NEWS THAT THE UNITED</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="62.13" dur="1.801">FANTASTIC NEWS THAT THE UNITED STATES HAVE DECIDED TO</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="63.965" dur="0.733">STATES HAVE DECIDED TO DECLASSIFY THIS INFORMATION THAT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="64.732" dur="2.368">DECLASSIFY THIS INFORMATION THAT THEY’VE BEEN PROVIDING TO OUR</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="67.102" dur="1.133">THEY’VE BEEN PROVIDING TO OUR ALLIES WITHOUT ABLE TO CONVINCE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="68.27" dur="1.3">ALLIES WITHOUT ABLE TO CONVINCE THEM SO I WOULD ASK U.S.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="69.604" dur="1.634">THEM SO I WOULD ASK U.S. PLEASE --</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="71.272" dur="1.468">PLEASE -- RELEASE SO-CALLED EVIDENCE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="72.741" dur="1.334">RELEASE SO-CALLED EVIDENCE BECAUSE AS --</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="74.109" dur="2.434">BECAUSE AS -- TELL COME AS VOTE GERMANY SAID</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="76.545" dur="1.199">TELL COME AS VOTE GERMANY SAID THEY’RE NOT WORRIED.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="77.746" dur="1.2">THEY’RE NOT WORRIED. THEY PROVIDE THE COMMITMENT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="78.947" dur="2.001">THEY PROVIDE THE COMMITMENT THAT’S NECESSARY FOR LAWFUL</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="80.949" dur="0.966">THAT’S NECESSARY FOR LAWFUL INTERCEPT OUR EQUIPMENT DOESN’T</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="81.917" dur="0.432">INTERCEPT OUR EQUIPMENT DOESN’T DO THAT.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="82.35" dur="1.868">DO THAT. WE DO NOT HAVE THAT ACCESS AND</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="84.219" dur="1.934">WE DO NOT HAVE THAT ACCESS AND THAT’S THE FACTS AND SO I’VE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="86.188" dur="0.799">THAT’S THE FACTS AND SO I’VE ENCOURAGED U.S. GOVERNMENT TO</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="87.022" dur="1.133">ENCOURAGED U.S. GOVERNMENT TO BRING THEIR SO-CALLED EVIDENCE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="88.19" dur="0.299">BRING THEIR SO-CALLED EVIDENCE FORWARD.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="88.523" dur="1.901">FORWARD. >> WAIT A SENDING WE DO HAVE --</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="90.425" dur="1.434">>> WAIT A SENDING WE DO HAVE -- WE ACTUALLY DO HAVE EVIDENCE AND</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="91.893" dur="1.801">WE ACTUALLY DO HAVE EVIDENCE AND YOU KNOW THAT.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="93.728" dur="1.734">YOU KNOW THAT. YOUR COMPANY HAS SETTLED WITH</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="95.496" dur="1.267">YOUR COMPANY HAS SETTLED WITH NUMBER OF TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="96.765" dur="1.567">NUMBER OF TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES AS A RESULT OF THIS.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="98.366" dur="1.701">AS A RESULT OF THIS. AMONG OTHER PUNISHES NOT TO</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="100.101" dur="1.401">AMONG OTHER PUNISHES NOT TO MENTION THE THEFT OF INTLEK</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="101.536" dur="1.1">MENTION THE THEFT OF INTLEK WHICH WILL PROPERTY AND WE KNOW</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="102.637" dur="1.601">WHICH WILL PROPERTY AND WE KNOW VOTE A PHONE ITALY HAD THIS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="104.239" dur="1.834">VOTE A PHONE ITALY HAD THIS ISSUE VOTE A VOTE ITALY FOUND</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="106.074" dur="1.601">ISSUE VOTE A VOTE ITALY FOUND OUT THAT THEY WERE BACK DOORS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="107.709" dur="1.935">OUT THAT THEY WERE BACK DOORS AND THEN THEY HAD TO RAISE THEIR</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="109.678" dur="2.101">AND THEN THEY HAD TO RAISE THEIR HAND, TELL HUAWEI EXECUTIVES</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="111.78" dur="1.801">HAND, TELL HUAWEI EXECUTIVES THEY’RE A BACK DOOR HERE AND DID</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="113.615" dur="1.534">THEY’RE A BACK DOOR HERE AND DID SOME KIND OF ADJUSTMENT YOU SAID</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="115.183" dur="2.001">SOME KIND OF ADJUSTMENT YOU SAID YOU CHANGED BACK DOOR SO WE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="117.218" dur="1.334">YOU CHANGED BACK DOOR SO WE ACTUALLY DO INDEED HAVE EVIDENCE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="118.587" dur="1.4">ACTUALLY DO INDEED HAVE EVIDENCE THAT THERE ARE BACK DOORSES ANDY</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="120.022" dur="0.666">THAT THERE ARE BACK DOORSES ANDY AND YOU KNOW THAT.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="120.689" dur="1.3">AND YOU KNOW THAT. YOU’RE THE CHIEF SECURITY</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="121.99" dur="0.333">YOU’RE THE CHIEF SECURITY OFFICER.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="122.357" dur="2.235">OFFICER. >> LAST TIME I WAS ON YOUR SHOW</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="124.626" dur="1.634">>> LAST TIME I WAS ON YOUR SHOW I ENCOURAGE YOU AND OFFERED YOU</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="126.295" dur="2.268">I ENCOURAGE YOU AND OFFERED YOU TO LET YOU USE MY PHONE AND VOTE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="128.564" dur="1.834">TO LET YOU USE MY PHONE AND VOTE IS A PHONE ITALY BECAUSE VOTE A</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="130.433" dur="1.099">IS A PHONE ITALY BECAUSE VOTE A PHONE ITALY DOES NOT BELIEVE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="131.567" dur="1.634">PHONE ITALY DOES NOT BELIEVE THAT HUAWEI HAD BACK DOORS THEY</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="133.235" dur="1.134">THAT HUAWEI HAD BACK DOORS THEY DO NOT BELIEVE THAT WHAT YOU</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="134.403" dur="1.2">DO NOT BELIEVE THAT WHAT YOU JUST SAID IS TRUE.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="135.638" dur="1.7">JUST SAID IS TRUE. BUT THE GREAT THING IS, THAT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="137.372" dur="2.435">BUT THE GREAT THING IS, THAT U.S. GOVERNMENT HAS SO-CALLED</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="139.808" dur="0.8">U.S. GOVERNMENT HAS SO-CALLED DECLASSIFIED THIS NEW</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="140.609" dur="0.7">DECLASSIFIED THIS NEW EVIDENCE --</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="141.343" dur="1.367">EVIDENCE -- AS THEY CONTINUE TO TRY TO COME</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="142.711" dur="2.502">AS THEY CONTINUE TO TRY TO COME UP WITH A SMOKING WHICH THEY</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="145.214" dur="1.4">UP WITH A SMOKING WHICH THEY DON’T HAVE CANT YOU JOIN ME</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="146.615" dur="1.367">DON’T HAVE CANT YOU JOIN ME MARIA AND ASKING THAT U.S.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="148.017" dur="1.9">MARIA AND ASKING THAT U.S. GOVERNMENT TO RELEASE THIS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="149.919" dur="0.699">GOVERNMENT TO RELEASE THIS UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="150.652" dur="2.302">UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION. >> I DON’T NEED TO SEE ANY</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="152.988" dur="1.2">>> I DON’T NEED TO SEE ANY UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="154.189" dur="1.334">UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION. I’VE ALREADY HEARD FROM THE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="155.557" dur="2.001">I’VE ALREADY HEARD FROM THE COMPANIES AND THEIR CEOS.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="157.593" dur="2.134">COMPANIES AND THEIR CEOS. MANY TIMES ANDY AND WHEN I LOOK</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="159.728" dur="1.601">MANY TIMES ANDY AND WHEN I LOOK AT VOTE A PHONE THE REASON THAT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="161.33" dur="2.301">AT VOTE A PHONE THE REASON THAT VOTE A TONE IS NOWEN A NEUTRAL</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="163.666" dur="1.8">VOTE A TONE IS NOWEN A NEUTRAL LEVEL IS BECAUSE YOU SETTLED</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="165.501" dur="0.833">LEVEL IS BECAUSE YOU SETTLED WITH THEM.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="166.369" dur="1.967">WITH THEM. AND A THE SETTLEMENTS ENSURE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="168.337" dur="2.835">AND A THE SETTLEMENTS ENSURE THAT THEY HAVE TO SEES ASIS AND</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="171.207" dur="1.133">THAT THEY HAVE TO SEES ASIS AND NOT DISCUSS THE CASE ANYMORE.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="172.375" dur="1.934">NOT DISCUSS THE CASE ANYMORE. >> VOTE A PHONE HAS SAID</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="174.343" dur="1.801">>> VOTE A PHONE HAS SAID PUBLICLY IN THE --</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="176.178" dur="1.701">PUBLICLY IN THE -- RECENTLY EVEN RESPONSE TO WALL</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="177.913" dur="0.834">RECENTLY EVEN RESPONSE TO WALL STREET JOURNAL ARTICLE THEY ARE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="178.781" dur="0.834">STREET JOURNAL ARTICLE THEY ARE NOT WORRIED.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="179.648" dur="1.667">NOT WORRIED. THAT THEY PROVIDE THE EQUIPMENT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="181.317" dur="2.935">THAT THEY PROVIDE THE EQUIPMENT THAT ALLOWS THE LAWFUL INTERCEPT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="184.287" dur="0.866">THAT ALLOWS THE LAWFUL INTERCEPT FROM OUR EQUIPMENT.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="185.154" dur="2.134">FROM OUR EQUIPMENT. WE DON’T PROVIDE THAT EQUIPMENT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="187.323" dur="1.434">WE DON’T PROVIDE THAT EQUIPMENT WITHOUT THEIR EQUIPMENT THERE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="188.758" dur="2.668">WITHOUT THEIR EQUIPMENT THERE CAN BE NO ACCESS SO ACCESS TO</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="191.427" dur="0.399">CAN BE NO ACCESS SO ACCESS TO PERMISSION.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="191.827" dur="1.734">PERMISSION. HERE’S A STORY THAT I HAVE IN</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="193.562" dur="1.701">HERE’S A STORY THAT I HAVE IN FRONT OF ME FROM PLC.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="195.297" dur="2.502">FRONT OF ME FROM PLC. VOTE A PHONE GROUP PLC HAS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="197.833" dur="1.234">VOTE A PHONE GROUP PLC HAS ACKNOWLEDGED</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="199.068" dur="2.568">ACKNOWLEDGED ACKNOWLEDGE IT HAS FOUND</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="201.637" dur="2.535">ACKNOWLEDGE IT HAS FOUND VULNERABLES BACK FOR YEARS BY</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="204.206" dur="2.836">VULNERABLES BACK FOR YEARS BY BASED HUAWEI FOR THE CARRIER</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="207.076" dur="0.867">BASED HUAWEI FOR THE CARRIER ITALIAN BUSINESS WHILE VOTE A</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="207.944" dur="2.635">ITALIAN BUSINESS WHILE VOTE A PHONE SAYS ISSUES WERE RESOLVED</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="210.613" dur="0.934">PHONE SAYS ISSUES WERE RESOLVED REVELATION MAY FURTHER DAMAGE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="211.581" dur="2.168">REVELATION MAY FURTHER DAMAGE THE REPUTATION OF A MAJOR SYMBOL</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="213.75" dur="2.134">THE REPUTATION OF A MAJOR SYMBOL OF CHINESE GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="215.919" dur="0.365">OF CHINESE GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY PARALYSIS.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="216.285" dur="2.802">PARALYSIS. THIS IS A BLOOMBERG STORY WHY</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="219.088" dur="0.9">THIS IS A BLOOMBERG STORY WHY DON’T YOU GRADE SCHOOL IT?</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="219.989" dur="1.701">DON’T YOU GRADE SCHOOL IT? >> ALL EQUIPMENT HAS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="221.691" dur="1.434">>> ALL EQUIPMENT HAS VULNERABILITIES.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="223.159" dur="1.701">VULNERABILITIES. THAT’S DIFFERENT THAN AN</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="224.861" dur="1.133">THAT’S DIFFERENT THAN AN INTENTIONAL MALICIOUS BACK DOOR</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="226.029" dur="1.033">INTENTIONAL MALICIOUS BACK DOOR MARCH WHY AND YOU KNOW THAT.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="227.096" dur="1.701">MARCH WHY AND YOU KNOW THAT. ENING ALL EQUIPMENT HAS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="228.798" dur="1">ENING ALL EQUIPMENT HAS VULNERABILITY?</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="229.799" dur="1.167">VULNERABILITY? ALL EQUIPMENT DOES NOT HAVE BACK</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="230.967" dur="1.434">ALL EQUIPMENT DOES NOT HAVE BACK DOORS TO THE CHINESE COMMUNE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="232.402" dur="1.5">DOORS TO THE CHINESE COMMUNE FIST GOVERNMENT.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="233.937" dur="1.533">FIST GOVERNMENT. WHY DO YOU HAVE SO MANY BACK</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="235.505" dur="1.801">WHY DO YOU HAVE SO MANY BACK DOORS GOING TO THE CHINESE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="237.34" dur="2.702">DOORS GOING TO THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT THAT THE COMMUNE FIST</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="240.076" dur="1.534">GOVERNMENT THAT THE COMMUNE FIST GOVERNMENT SO THAT ANYBODY DATA</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="241.611" dur="1.801">GOVERNMENT SO THAT ANYBODY DATA IS OUT THERE AND GOES RIGHT BACK</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="243.413" dur="2.702">IS OUT THERE AND GOES RIGHT BACK TO THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT?</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="246.149" dur="1.867">TO THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT? WE KNOW THIS HUAWEI IS A CHINESE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="248.018" dur="2.567">WE KNOW THIS HUAWEI IS A CHINESE COMPANY IF YOU CAN’T GO AGAINST</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="250.62" dur="2.101">COMPANY IF YOU CAN’T GO AGAINST CHINA RULE ARE YOU GOING TO SAY</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="252.722" dur="1.167">CHINA RULE ARE YOU GOING TO SAY TO XI JINPING WE’RE NOT GOING TO</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="253.89" dur="2.101">TO XI JINPING WE’RE NOT GOING TO PUT A BACK DOOR ON THIS AND GO</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="255.992" dur="2.401">PUT A BACK DOOR ON THIS AND GO UP AGAINST THAT EVEN THOUGH WE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="258.395" dur="1.3">UP AGAINST THAT EVEN THOUGH WE KNOW CHINESE ECONOMIES HAVE TO</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="259.696" dur="1.033">KNOW CHINESE ECONOMIES HAVE TO LIST TO COMMUNE FIST GOVERNMENT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="260.73" dur="0.5">LIST TO COMMUNE FIST GOVERNMENT OF CHINA?</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="261.231" dur="1">OF CHINA? >> ABSOLUTELY.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="262.232" dur="1.2">>> ABSOLUTELY. AND UNFORTUNATELY WHEN YOU LOOK</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="263.467" dur="2.434">AND UNFORTUNATELY WHEN YOU LOOK AT THIS SITUATION, LOOK AT IT IN</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="265.936" dur="1.7">AT THIS SITUATION, LOOK AT IT IN A MACRO SENSE THAT YIET IS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="267.638" dur="1.5">A MACRO SENSE THAT YIET IS TRYING TO HURT CHINA BY HURTING</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="269.172" dur="1">TRYING TO HURT CHINA BY HURTING WAY.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="270.206" dur="2.235">WAY. CLEARLY, THE UNITED STATES IS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="272.442" dur="2.201">CLEARLY, THE UNITED STATES IS HURTING AMERICA MORE THAN IT IS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="274.644" dur="1.1">HURTING AMERICA MORE THAN IT IS HURTING WAY AND UNITED STATES</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="275.745" dur="1.701">HURTING WAY AND UNITED STATES WILL NOT THINK THIS PASSIONATELY</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="277.447" dur="1.367">WILL NOT THINK THIS PASSIONATELY ABOUT WHAT IS MOST IMPORTANT TO</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="278.815" dur="0.933">ABOUT WHAT IS MOST IMPORTANT TO THE UNITED STATES IN MATERIALS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="279.749" dur="1.801">THE UNITED STATES IN MATERIALS OF THE COMPETITION WITHIN CHINA.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="281.584" dur="2.135">OF THE COMPETITION WITHIN CHINA. UNITED STATES WILL NOT CREATE A</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="283.753" dur="1.067">UNITED STATES WILL NOT CREATE A TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION POLICY.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="284.821" dur="1">TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION POLICY. THEY WILL NOT --</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="285.822" dur="2.034">THEY WILL NOT -- >> ANDY, ANDY --</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="287.858" dur="1.967">>> ANDY, ANDY -- CHAIRMAN OF YOUR COMPANY --</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="289.827" dur="1.333">CHAIRMAN OF YOUR COMPANY -- COME ON ANDY.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="291.161" dur="0.499">COME ON ANDY. PLEASE.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="291.695" dur="1.7">PLEASE. AND CHAIRMAN OF YOUR COMPANY --</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="293.43" dur="2.101">AND CHAIRMAN OF YOUR COMPANY -- 00 COMPANIES TO SETTLE HUAWEI.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="295.532" dur="1">00 COMPANIES TO SETTLE HUAWEI. THE CHAIRMAN OF YOUR COMPANY IS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="296.533" dur="1.834">THE CHAIRMAN OF YOUR COMPANY IS A MEMBER OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY,</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="298.402" dur="0.499">A MEMBER OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY, CORRECT?</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="298.935" dur="1.534">CORRECT? WE CAN PUT IN --</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="300.47" dur="1.467">WE CAN PUT IN -- HOW MANY BOARD MEMBERS ON HUAWEI</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="301.938" dur="1.234">HOW MANY BOARD MEMBERS ON HUAWEI BOARD ARE MEMBERS OF THE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="303.206" dur="1.501">BOARD ARE MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY?</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="304.741" dur="0.299">COMMUNIST PARTY? FIVE?</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="305.042" dur="1.734">FIVE? >> I HAVE NO IDEA MARIA BUT WE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="306.81" dur="3.036">>> I HAVE NO IDEA MARIA BUT WE CAN PUT IT AND PROVE THAT OUR</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="309.88" dur="1.867">CAN PUT IT AND PROVE THAT OUR EQUIPMENT IS NOT SUBJECT TO ANY</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="311.749" dur="1.433">EQUIPMENT IS NOT SUBJECT TO ANY INFLUENCE FOR THE CHINA</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="313.183" dur="1">INFLUENCE FOR THE CHINA GOVERNMENT AND WE CAN PROVE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="314.184" dur="0.666">GOVERNMENT AND WE CAN PROVE SO --</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="314.852" dur="1.734">SO -- >> HOW DO YOU PROVE THAT BECAUSE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="316.62" dur="1.467">>> HOW DO YOU PROVE THAT BECAUSE I’VE GOT THIS RIGHT HERE.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="318.089" dur="1.7">I’VE GOT THIS RIGHT HERE. EUROPE BIGGEST PHONE COMPANY</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="319.79" dur="1.3">EUROPE BIGGEST PHONE COMPANY IDENTIFY HIS OPINION BACK DOOR</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="321.091" dur="1.133">IDENTIFY HIS OPINION BACK DOOR IN SOFTWARE THAT COULD HAVE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="322.259" dur="2.935">IN SOFTWARE THAT COULD HAVE GIVEN HUAWEI UNTHORSZED ACCESS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="325.229" dur="1.667">GIVEN HUAWEI UNTHORSZED ACCESS TO CARRIERS FIXED LINE NETWORK A</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="326.897" dur="1.334">TO CARRIERS FIXED LINE NETWORK A SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES INTERNET</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="328.265" dur="2.235">SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES INTERNET SERVICE TO L HL HADS HOME IT PRE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="330.534" dur="1.334">SERVICE TO L HL HADS HOME IT PRE CLEAR THAT HUAWEI WANTS TO SET</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="331.902" dur="1.601">CLEAR THAT HUAWEI WANTS TO SET UP INFRASTRUCTURE IN ALL OF THE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="333.504" dur="3.302">UP INFRASTRUCTURE IN ALL OF THE AS MANY COUNTRIES AS WILL ALLOW</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="336.841" dur="2.067">AS MANY COUNTRIES AS WILL ALLOW BY GIVING THEM CHEAP</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="338.909" dur="1.2">BY GIVING THEM CHEAP INFRASTRUCTURE SO THEY HAVE BACK</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="340.11" dur="2.301">INFRASTRUCTURE SO THEY HAVE BACK DOOR INTO ALL OF THIS HAD DATA</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="342.413" dur="1.2">DOOR INTO ALL OF THIS HAD DATA AND CHINESE COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="343.614" dur="1.534">AND CHINESE COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT CAN STEAL DA A TAY AND GET</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="345.182" dur="2.001">CAN STEAL DA A TAY AND GET SMARTER IN TERMS HOW OTHERS ARE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="347.184" dur="0.8">SMARTER IN TERMS HOW OTHERS ARE DOING THEIR BUSINESS WHATEVER IT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="347.985" dur="1.3">DOING THEIR BUSINESS WHATEVER IT IS THAT COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="349.286" dur="1.934">IS THAT COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT WANTS THIS DATA FOR.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="351.222" dur="3.502">WANTS THIS DATA FOR. >> APPARENTLY MOST THE WORLD</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="354.726" dur="0.899">>> APPARENTLY MOST THE WORLD DOESN’T AGREE WITH YOU AND</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="355.659" dur="0.967">DOESN’T AGREE WITH YOU AND BELIEVE THERE’S SUCH EVIDENCE.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="356.627" dur="1.3">BELIEVE THERE’S SUCH EVIDENCE. WE HAVE TESTING MECHANISMS IN</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="357.928" dur="2.301">WE HAVE TESTING MECHANISMS IN PLACE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM IN</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="360.231" dur="1.868">PLACE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM IN BOND IN BRUSSELS IN CANADA WHERE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="362.133" dur="1.8">BOND IN BRUSSELS IN CANADA WHERE THE EQUIPMENT CAN BE TESTED.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="363.935" dur="2.367">THE EQUIPMENT CAN BE TESTED. THE FORMER DEPUTY FOR DNI SAID</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="366.303" dur="2.201">THE FORMER DEPUTY FOR DNI SAID WE CAN FIND BACK DOOR AND WE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="368.506" dur="1.534">WE CAN FIND BACK DOOR AND WE HAVE MECHANISMS IN PLACE FOR</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="370.041" dur="1.4">HAVE MECHANISMS IN PLACE FOR ACCESSING DATA WE CAN PROVE THAT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="371.476" dur="2.835">ACCESSING DATA WE CAN PROVE THAT OUR DATA IS ONLY SUBJECT TO --</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="374.345" dur="2.268">OUR DATA IS ONLY SUBJECT TO -- SUBJECT TO TOTAL CONTROL BY THE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="376.614" dur="1.334">SUBJECT TO TOTAL CONTROL BY THE CARRIERS, EVERY KEY STROKE THAT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="377.982" dur="1.501">CARRIERS, EVERY KEY STROKE THAT WE ACCESS IS RECORDED.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="379.517" dur="1.333">WE ACCESS IS RECORDED. THEY KNOW WHETHER --</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="380.852" dur="1.299">THEY KNOW WHETHER -- WHAT WE ACCESS AND THEY KNOW</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="382.153" dur="1.267">WHAT WE ACCESS AND THEY KNOW WHAT WE DO WITH IT AND PROVE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="383.421" dur="3.302">WHAT WE DO WITH IT AND PROVE WE’RE NOT SUBJECT TO THE PICKET</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="386.724" dur="0.833">WE’RE NOT SUBJECT TO THE PICKET POINT OF THE CHINA GOVERNMENT.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="387.558" dur="2.168">POINT OF THE CHINA GOVERNMENT. >> YOU HAVE CHINESE COMMUNESSIST</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="389.727" dur="1.434">>> YOU HAVE CHINESE COMMUNESSIST ON BOARD AND RUNNING COMPANY.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="391.195" dur="1.701">ON BOARD AND RUNNING COMPANY. CHAIRL OF THE BOARD --</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="392.93" dur="1.601">CHAIRL OF THE BOARD -- IS A MEMBER OF THE COMMUNIST</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="394.532" dur="2.001">IS A MEMBER OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY YOU HAVE SEVERAL BOARD</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="396.534" dur="0.8">PARTY YOU HAVE SEVERAL BOARD MEMBERS THAT ARE MEMBERS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="397.335" dur="2.134">MEMBERS THAT ARE MEMBERS OFFICIAL MEMBERS OF THE CHINESE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="399.504" dur="0.766">OFFICIAL MEMBERS OF THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY ANDY.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="400.271" dur="1.601">COMMUNIST PARTY ANDY. YOU SHOULD KNOW THIS AND I KNOW</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="401.873" dur="1.133">YOU SHOULD KNOW THIS AND I KNOW YOU DO KNOW THIS BECAUSE YOU’RE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="403.041" dur="2.935">YOU DO KNOW THIS BECAUSE YOU’RE THE CHIEF SECURITY OFFICER.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="406.011" dur="0.999">THE CHIEF SECURITY OFFICER. BUT MARIA, YOU’RE NOT LISTEN</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="407.045" dur="1.3">BUT MARIA, YOU’RE NOT LISTEN HADDING TO WHAT I’M SAYING I</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="408.346" dur="1.133">HADDING TO WHAT I’M SAYING I KNOW YOU THINK YOU ARE BUT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="409.48" dur="0.6">KNOW YOU THINK YOU ARE BUT YOU’RE NOT.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="410.114" dur="1.701">YOU’RE NOT. THE FACT IS THERE ARE MECHANISMS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="411.849" dur="2.435">THE FACT IS THERE ARE MECHANISMS IN PLACE WHERE INDEPENDENT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="414.285" dur="1.267">IN PLACE WHERE INDEPENDENT EXPERTS CAN TEST THE SOFTWARE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="415.553" dur="1.734">EXPERTS CAN TEST THE SOFTWARE FOR VULNERABILITIES, AND CAN</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="417.288" dur="1.968">FOR VULNERABILITIES, AND CAN TEST FOR BACK DOORS, AND</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="419.257" dur="1">TEST FOR BACK DOORS, AND REGARDING THE --</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="420.258" dur="2.001">REGARDING THE -- THE UPDATES TO THE EQUIPMENT,</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="422.26" dur="1.934">THE UPDATES TO THE EQUIPMENT, INDEPENDENT EXPERTS CAN EVALUATE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="424.229" dur="1.667">INDEPENDENT EXPERTS CAN EVALUATE UPDATES TO MAKE A SUREST THERE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="425.897" dur="2.401">UPDATES TO MAKE A SUREST THERE IS NO IMPROPER ACCESS BY HUAWEI</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="428.299" dur="0.6">IS NO IMPROPER ACCESS BY HUAWEI TO ANY CUSTOMER.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="428.9" dur="2.869">TO ANY CUSTOMER. >> WHERE WERE THESE INDEPENDENT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="431.803" dur="1.5">>> WHERE WERE THESE INDEPENDENT EXPERT WHEN VOTE A PHONE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="433.305" dur="1.6">EXPERT WHEN VOTE A PHONE FOUNDING BACK OR DOORS WHERE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="434.906" dur="1.667">FOUNDING BACK OR DOORS WHERE WERE THESE INABOUT DEPENDENT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="436.574" dur="0.934">WERE THESE INABOUT DEPENDENT EXPERTS WHEN OTHERS THROUGHOUT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="437.542" dur="1.167">EXPERTS WHEN OTHERS THROUGHOUT EUROPE WITH AND AFRICA FOUNDING</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="438.71" dur="3.703">EUROPE WITH AND AFRICA FOUNDING BACK DOORSES AFTER YOU STALLED</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="442.414" dur="1.534">BACK DOORSES AFTER YOU STALLED IN FREE AFRICA NATIONS WHERE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="443.982" dur="1.734">IN FREE AFRICA NATIONS WHERE WERE THESE INDEPENDENT AND WHO</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="445.717" dur="1.2">WERE THESE INDEPENDENT AND WHO ARE THESE I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="446.918" dur="1.767">ARE THESE I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THEM ON THE SHOW.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="448.687" dur="3.535">THEM ON THE SHOW. >> SURE, I’LL GET YOU NAMES OF</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="452.257" dur="0.332">>> SURE, I’LL GET YOU NAMES OF COMPANIES.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="452.624" dur="1.3">COMPANIES. >> TELL ME NOW --</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="453.925" dur="1.601">>> TELL ME NOW -- >> NO NAMES OFF THE TOP OF MY</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="455.56" dur="0.934">>> NO NAMES OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD I’M SORRY.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="456.528" dur="2.802">HEAD I’M SORRY. >> LET ME ASK YOU THIS BECAUSE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="459.364" dur="1.301">>> LET ME ASK YOU THIS BECAUSE PENTAGON SET TO BACK NEW U.S.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="460.699" dur="5.905">PENTAGON SET TO BACK NEW U.S. RESTRICTION ISES ON HUAWEI AND</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="466.605" dur="2.101">RESTRICTION ISES ON HUAWEI AND PUTT ON EXPERTS HOW HAS THAT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="468.707" dur="1.033">PUTT ON EXPERTS HOW HAS THAT IMPACTED COMPANY ANDY?</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="469.775" dur="1.533">IMPACTED COMPANY ANDY? >> I’M SORRY MISSED FIRST PART</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="471.343" dur="0.666">>> I’M SORRY MISSED FIRST PART OF YOUR QUESTION.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="472.01" dur="2.134">OF YOUR QUESTION. >> WELL L WE HAVE NOW NEW</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="474.146" dur="1.3">>> WELL L WE HAVE NOW NEW RESTRICTIONS ON HUAWEI</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="475.447" dur="1.267">RESTRICTIONS ON HUAWEI EQUIPMENT.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="476.715" dur="1.434">EQUIPMENT. HOW IS IT IMPACTED YOUR COMPANY?</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="478.15" dur="2.268">HOW IS IT IMPACTED YOUR COMPANY? THE PENTAGON IS SET TO BACK NEW</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="480.419" dur="1.533">THE PENTAGON IS SET TO BACK NEW RESTRICTIONS ON HUAWEI</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="481.954" dur="0.866">RESTRICTIONS ON HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="482.821" dur="1.834">TECHNOLOGIES. >> WELL, THERE ARE TWO ISSUES</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="484.656" dur="1.401">>> WELL, THERE ARE TWO ISSUES THIS IS ABILITY TO SELL IN WHICH</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="486.091" dur="0.967">THIS IS ABILITY TO SELL IN WHICH YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT IS ABILITY</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="487.059" dur="3.302">YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT IS ABILITY OF UP TO 300 COMPANIESES ONE IS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="490.362" dur="1.367">OF UP TO 300 COMPANIESES ONE IS SELL TO HUAWEI.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="491.763" dur="2.869">SELL TO HUAWEI. THE DEPARTMENT OF THE DEFENSE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="494.633" dur="2.235">THE DEPARTMENT OF THE DEFENSE THAT INTERPOSED RULE TO FURTHER</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="496.869" dur="1.867">THAT INTERPOSED RULE TO FURTHER LIMIT ABILITY OF AMERICAN</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="498.738" dur="0.732">LIMIT ABILITY OF AMERICAN COMPANIES</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="499.471" dur="2.001">COMPANIES SELL TO HUAWEI WE PURCHASE ABOUT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="501.473" dur="1.267">SELL TO HUAWEI WE PURCHASE ABOUT 11 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR AND</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="502.741" dur="2.435">11 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR AND FACT IS AND I’VE COME BACK FROM</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="505.177" dur="1.801">FACT IS AND I’VE COME BACK FROM DETAIL MEETINGS, IT IS CLEAR</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="506.979" dur="1.867">DETAIL MEETINGS, IT IS CLEAR THAT WHILE THE IMPACT ON HUAWEI</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="508.848" dur="1.6">THAT WHILE THE IMPACT ON HUAWEI WILL BE AN IMPACT OF THE FACT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="510.449" dur="1.033">WILL BE AN IMPACT OF THE FACT THAT WE CAN’T BUY THOSE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="511.517" dur="0.566">THAT WE CAN’T BUY THOSE TECHNOLOGIES.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="512.084" dur="1.2">TECHNOLOGIES. AND WE WOULD LIKE TO COME BACK</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="513.285" dur="0.766">AND WE WOULD LIKE TO COME BACK TO BUY THEM.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="514.086" dur="1.901">TO BUY THEM. BUT WHAT IS CERTAIN IS, WE’RE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="515.988" dur="1.701">BUT WHAT IS CERTAIN IS, WE’RE GOING TO BE FINE OUR PLAN B</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="517.69" dur="1.8">GOING TO BE FINE OUR PLAN B ISING WORKING WELL AND WE’RE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="519.525" dur="0.732">ISING WORKING WELL AND WE’RE INCREDITTEDDABLY SUCCESSFUL EVEN</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="520.292" dur="2.001">INCREDITTEDDABLY SUCCESSFUL EVEN IF WE DON’T BUY FROM AMERICAN</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="522.327" dur="0.867">IF WE DON’T BUY FROM AMERICAN COMPANIESES AND HAD AMERICA IS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="523.195" dur="0.833">COMPANIESES AND HAD AMERICA IS GOING TO LOSE.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="524.063" dur="1.901">GOING TO LOSE. U.S. HAS TO THINK ABOUT WHAT IS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="525.965" dur="2.534">U.S. HAS TO THINK ABOUT WHAT IS GOING TO BENEFIT THE U.S. THE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="528.501" dur="0.499">GOING TO BENEFIT THE U.S. THE MOST.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="529.034" dur="0.967">MOST. CONSEQUENCES OF THESE DECISIONS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="530.002" dur="1.968">CONSEQUENCES OF THESE DECISIONS AND WHAT KIND OF LITIGATION TO</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="532.004" dur="1">AND WHAT KIND OF LITIGATION TO BE PUT IN PLACE.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="533.038" dur="3.369">BE PUT IN PLACE. >> DISCUSSIONS NEED TO BE HAD.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="536.408" dur="1.267">>> DISCUSSIONS NEED TO BE HAD. >> YOU KNOW --</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="537.71" dur="2.268">>> YOU KNOW -- WHAT SIZZLE FUSION IS --</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="539.979" dur="1.834">WHAT SIZZLE FUSION IS -- WHERE ANY TECHNOLOGY GOING INTO</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="541.848" dur="1.433">WHERE ANY TECHNOLOGY GOING INTO CHINA HAS TO FIRST GO TO THE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="543.315" dur="0.566">CHINA HAS TO FIRST GO TO THE MILITARY.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="543.883" dur="1.533">MILITARY. YOU KNOW THAT CHINESE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="545.418" dur="1.7">YOU KNOW THAT CHINESE ASPIRATIONS TO BE THE NUMBER ONE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="547.119" dur="1.601">ASPIRATIONS TO BE THE NUMBER ONE SUPERPOWER IN THE WORLD BOTH</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="548.721" dur="1.801">SUPERPOWER IN THE WORLD BOTH ECONOMICALLY AND A MILITARILY.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="550.556" dur="2.168">ECONOMICALLY AND A MILITARILY. YOUR PRODUCTS ARE ENABLE AING</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="552.725" dur="2.168">YOUR PRODUCTS ARE ENABLE AING OTHER COMPANIES IF TO ALLOW</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="554.927" dur="1.968">OTHER COMPANIES IF TO ALLOW ACCESS INTO THEIR DATA SO THAT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="556.896" dur="2.635">ACCESS INTO THEIR DATA SO THAT THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT CAN HAVE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="559.565" dur="1.601">THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT CAN HAVE THOSE GOALS AND ACHIEVE THOSE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="561.2" dur="0.299">THOSE GOALS AND ACHIEVE THOSE GOALS.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="561.5" dur="2.235">GOALS. IT IS VERY CLEAR AND NOW MORE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="563.769" dur="1.1">IT IS VERY CLEAR AND NOW MORE PEOPLE KNOW THIS.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="564.904" dur="1.3">PEOPLE KNOW THIS. SECRETARY POMPEO JUST GAVE A</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="566.205" dur="2.401">SECRETARY POMPEO JUST GAVE A SPEECH LAST WEEK TO THE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="568.608" dur="1.634">SPEECH LAST WEEK TO THE GOVERNORS ABOUT WHAT CHINESE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="570.243" dur="0.899">GOVERNORS ABOUT WHAT CHINESE GOVERNMENT ISING DOING AND YOUR</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="571.177" dur="1.333">GOVERNMENT ISING DOING AND YOUR COMPANY IS IN ARM OF THE CHINESE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="572.545" dur="0.399">COMPANY IS IN ARM OF THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="572.945" dur="1.1">GOVERNMENT. YOU CANNOT GO AGAINST THE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="574.046" dur="1.667">YOU CANNOT GO AGAINST THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT AND SAY WE’RE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="575.715" dur="1.233">CHINESE GOVERNMENT AND SAY WE’RE NOT GOING TO HAVE A BACK DOOR.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="576.983" dur="1.533">NOT GOING TO HAVE A BACK DOOR. WE’RE NOT GOING TO GIVE ACCESS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="578.551" dur="1.3">WE’RE NOT GOING TO GIVE ACCESS SO THAT DATA GOES BACK TO</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="579.852" dur="1.267">SO THAT DATA GOES BACK TO CHINESE GOVERNMENTS.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="581.12" dur="0.933">CHINESE GOVERNMENTS. IT’S AGAINST THE LAW.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="582.088" dur="1.366">IT’S AGAINST THE LAW. YOU’RE GOING TO GO FIGHT WITH XI</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="583.456" dur="1.167">YOU’RE GOING TO GO FIGHT WITH XI JINPING ON THIS?</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="584.657" dur="3.87">JINPING ON THIS? >> EXPERTS, KNOW THAT WE CAN</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="588.528" dur="1.5">>> EXPERTS, KNOW THAT WE CAN TEST INDEPENDENT EXPERTS CAN</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="590.03" dur="0.432">TEST INDEPENDENT EXPERTS CAN TEST BACK DOOR.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="590.496" dur="2.135">TEST BACK DOOR. >> HOW DO YOU TEST AND GIVE US</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="592.665" dur="0.967">>> HOW DO YOU TEST AND GIVE US WHAT ARE THE TESTS?</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="593.633" dur="2.435">WHAT ARE THE TESTS? DGES TALK TO MAIN FOR EXAMPLE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="596.069" dur="1.367">DGES TALK TO MAIN FOR EXAMPLE WHEN THEY DO A COMPLETE BREAK</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="597.437" dur="1.6">WHEN THEY DO A COMPLETE BREAK DOWN OF THE CODE.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="599.039" dur="1.099">DOWN OF THE CODE. WHY DO YOU THINK ERICKSON ARE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="600.139" dur="1.4">WHY DO YOU THINK ERICKSON ARE ALLOWED TO DO BUSINESS IN UNITED</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="601.541" dur="1.333">ALLOWED TO DO BUSINESS IN UNITED STATES DESPITE THEIR DEEP TIES</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="602.876" dur="1.967">STATES DESPITE THEIR DEEP TIES TO CHINA INCLUDING DEEP TIES TO</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="604.844" dur="0.833">TO CHINA INCLUDING DEEP TIES TO THE CHINA GOVERNMENT BECAUSE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="605.678" dur="1.601">THE CHINA GOVERNMENT BECAUSE THERE’S A GOVERNMENT MONITORED</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="607.28" dur="1.4">THERE’S A GOVERNMENT MONITORED RISK MITIGATION INCLUDING</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="608.715" dur="1.066">RISK MITIGATION INCLUDING INDEPENDENT TESTING OF THE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="609.782" dur="0.7">INDEPENDENT TESTING OF THE PRODUCTS.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="610.483" dur="2.001">PRODUCTS. WE WANT TO TALK ABOUT THAT --</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="612.485" dur="0.867">WE WANT TO TALK ABOUT THAT -- WITH THE U.S. GOVERNMENT.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="613.386" dur="1.701">WITH THE U.S. GOVERNMENT. >> SETTLE WITH 10 PLUS COMPANIES</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="615.088" dur="3.069">>> SETTLE WITH 10 PLUS COMPANIES IN TERMS OF INTELLECTUAL FACT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="618.158" dur="2.301">IN TERMS OF INTELLECTUAL FACT WHY ALL OF THE SETTLEMENT?</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="620.46" dur="1.834">WHY ALL OF THE SETTLEMENT? CISCO ERICKSON ACROSS THE BOARD,</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="622.295" dur="2.602">CISCO ERICKSON ACROSS THE BOARD, AMERICAN COMPANIES HAVE SAID</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="624.931" dur="1.534">AMERICAN COMPANIES HAVE SAID MICROSOFT WE HAVE FORMER CEOEN</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="626.499" dur="1.367">MICROSOFT WE HAVE FORMER CEOEN THIS PROGRAM SAYING THAT THEFT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="627.867" dur="1.2">THIS PROGRAM SAYING THAT THEFT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FROM</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="629.069" dur="2.034">OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FROM CHINA COST THE COMPANY TENS OF</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="631.138" dur="1.967">CHINA COST THE COMPANY TENS OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS EVERY YEAR.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="633.106" dur="1.3">BILLIONS OF DOLLARS EVERY YEAR. WHY ALL A OF THE SETTLEMENT AND</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="634.407" dur="3.135">WHY ALL A OF THE SETTLEMENT AND THEN THOSE SETTLEMENTS INCLUDE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="637.577" dur="1.434">THEN THOSE SETTLEMENTS INCLUDE ASSIST LETTER TO THOSE CEO SAY</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="639.045" dur="2.368">ASSIST LETTER TO THOSE CEO SAY YOU CAN NOT DISCUSS WHAT JUST</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="641.414" dur="0.666">YOU CAN NOT DISCUSS WHAT JUST WENT ON.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="642.115" dur="2.001">WENT ON. >> BUT MARIALET BE FAIR LET’S</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="644.15" dur="1.034">>> BUT MARIALET BE FAIR LET’S LOOK AT THE HISTORY OF THAT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="645.218" dur="1.601">LOOK AT THE HISTORY OF THAT INDUSTRY IS THAT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="646.82" dur="0.599">INDUSTRY IS THAT TELECOMMUNICATION MOBILE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="647.421" dur="0.365">TELECOMMUNICATION MOBILE INDUSTRY.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="647.787" dur="2.401">INDUSTRY. LET’S LOOK AT THE NUMBER --</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="650.19" dur="0.7">LET’S LOOK AT THE NUMBER -- HISTORY OF THE INDUSTRY BUT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="650.891" dur="3.435">HISTORY OF THE INDUSTRY BUT LOOKING AT HUAWEI TECHNOLOGY</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="654.361" dur="1.667">LOOKING AT HUAWEI TECHNOLOGY THAT ALLOW DATA BACK TO CHINESE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="656.029" dur="1.3">THAT ALLOW DATA BACK TO CHINESE GOVERNMENT AND I’M LOOKING AT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="657.33" dur="1.067">GOVERNMENT AND I’M LOOKING AT THE INTELLECTUAL THEFT THAT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="658.432" dur="1.867">THE INTELLECTUAL THEFT THAT HUAWEI HAS DONE ON ALL A OF</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="660.301" dur="1.199">HUAWEI HAS DONE ON ALL A OF THESE TELL COME COMPANIES.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="661.501" dur="2.335">THESE TELL COME COMPANIES. WHAT IS HUAWEI ANYWAY?</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="663.87" dur="1.401">WHAT IS HUAWEI ANYWAY? HUAWEI BEGAN BECAUSE IT WAS --</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="665.305" dur="2.935">HUAWEI BEGAN BECAUSE IT WAS -- THE BEGINNINGS OF THE CANADIAN</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="668.275" dur="1.099">THE BEGINNINGS OF THE CANADIAN COMPANY WHICH YOU CHANGE NAME</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="669.409" dur="0.733">COMPANY WHICH YOU CHANGE NAME OF.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="670.143" dur="1.267">OF. NOT YOU BUT YOUR --</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="671.411" dur="2.134">NOT YOU BUT YOUR -- YOUR EXECUTIVES CHANGE NAME OF,</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="673.547" dur="1.4">YOUR EXECUTIVES CHANGE NAME OF, AND BECAME HUAWEI THAT WAS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="674.982" dur="4.036">AND BECAME HUAWEI THAT WAS ACTUALLY CANADIAN COMPANY.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="679.052" dur="2.001">ACTUALLY CANADIAN COMPANY. CONSIDER LET’S GET THE EVIDENCE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="681.087" dur="1.401">CONSIDER LET’S GET THE EVIDENCE RERELEASED ON THIS MAJOR</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="682.522" dur="1.133">RERELEASED ON THIS MAJOR ALLEGATION BY THE U.S.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="683.657" dur="0.399">ALLEGATION BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="684.057" dur="1.3">GOVERNMENT. THEY WILL NOT RELEASE THE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="685.359" dur="1.1">THEY WILL NOT RELEASE THE INFORMATION BECAUSE THEY DO</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="686.46" dur="0.299">INFORMATION BECAUSE THEY DO NOT --</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="686.76" dur="2.268">NOT -- >> THEY’RE RELEASING IT EVERY</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="689.029" dur="1.234">>> THEY’RE RELEASING IT EVERY DAY SECRETARY POMPEO WAS TALKING</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="690.297" dur="1.601">DAY SECRETARY POMPEO WAS TALKING TO ALL OF THE GOVERNORS LAST</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="691.932" dur="1.2">TO ALL OF THE GOVERNORS LAST WEEK HE’S BEEN ON THIS SET</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="693.133" dur="1.734">WEEK HE’S BEEN ON THIS SET TALKING TO ME ABOUT THE RISKS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="694.901" dur="1.334">TALKING TO ME ABOUT THE RISKS AROUND HUAWEI.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="696.27" dur="1">AROUND HUAWEI. THE PRESIDENT WHILE DOING A</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="697.304" dur="2.135">THE PRESIDENT WHILE DOING A TRADE DEAL IS ALSO TELLING</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="699.473" dur="1.5">TRADE DEAL IS ALSO TELLING EVERYBODY IN AMERICA THE RISKSES</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="700.975" dur="2.101">EVERYBODY IN AMERICA THE RISKSES AROUND HUAWEI TOO IF YOU WANT TO</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="703.109" dur="1.602">AROUND HUAWEI TOO IF YOU WANT TO DO BUSINESS WITH HUAWEI DO IT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="704.745" dur="2.935">DO BUSINESS WITH HUAWEI DO IT WITH YOUR EYES OPEN BECAUSE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="707.681" dur="1.4">WITH YOUR EYES OPEN BECAUSE THEY’LL STEAL AND CHEAT AND</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="709.083" dur="0.9">THEY’LL STEAL AND CHEAT AND THEY’LL HAVE OPEN DOORS TO</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="709.984" dur="0.499">THEY’LL HAVE OPEN DOORS TO CHINESE GOVERNMENT.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="710.518" dur="1.533">CHINESE GOVERNMENT. WE KNOW THIS ANDY.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="712.086" dur="1.267">WE KNOW THIS ANDY. >> FORTUNATELY THE U.K.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="713.354" dur="1.3">>> FORTUNATELY THE U.K. GOVERNMENT HAS SAID THEY WANT TO</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="714.655" dur="1.701">GOVERNMENT HAS SAID THEY WANT TO TAKE AN EVIDENCE-BASED APPROACH</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="716.357" dur="1.534">TAKE AN EVIDENCE-BASED APPROACH AS CLOSEST ALLIES, THEY ARE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="717.925" dur="1.501">AS CLOSEST ALLIES, THEY ARE REJECTING WHAT THE U.S. SAYS.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="719.46" dur="1.333">REJECTING WHAT THE U.S. SAYS. AND THERE’S A REASON FOR THAT.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="720.795" dur="1.266">AND THERE’S A REASON FOR THAT. AND WHILE THEY TALK IN THE HIGH</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="722.062" dur="1.701">AND WHILE THEY TALK IN THE HIGH LEVEL MATERIALS ABOUT THIS MOST</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="723.764" dur="1.701">LEVEL MATERIALS ABOUT THIS MOST RECENT ALLEGATION, THEY WILL NOT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="725.466" dur="3.736">RECENT ALLEGATION, THEY WILL NOT PRODUCE FACTS THAT DEMONSTRATE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="729.236" dur="0.633">PRODUCE FACTS THAT DEMONSTRATE THEY’RE CORRECT.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="729.904" dur="1.367">THEY’RE CORRECT. I HOPE YOU CAN BRING SOME OF</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="731.272" dur="1.534">I HOPE YOU CAN BRING SOME OF THAT EVIDENCE WITH YOU BECAUSE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="732.807" dur="2.901">THAT EVIDENCE WITH YOU BECAUSE WE WOULD ALL LIKE TO SEE IT AND</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="735.743" dur="1.067">WE WOULD ALL LIKE TO SEE IT AND ALL OF THIS EVIDENCE THAT YOU’RE</text>