Dems target Trump's economy after impeachment fail subtitles

DAVID: DEMOCRAT HOPE TO EXTENTDAVID: DEMOCRAT HOPE TO EXTENT THEIR HAND AFTER IMPEACHMENTTHEIR HAND AFTER IMPEACHMENT FAILED CAPITOL HILL, REPORTINGFAILED CAPITOL HILL, REPORTING THAT SPEAKER PELOSI LOOKING FORTHAT SPEAKER PELOSI LOOKING FOR HER NEXT ATTACK, HOSTING AHER NEXT ATTACK, HOSTING A SPECIAL SPEAKER’S MEETINGSPECIAL SPEAKER’S MEETING TUESDAY WITH TOP OBAMA ECONOMICTUESDAY WITH TOP OBAMA ECONOMIC ADVISER TO EXPLAIN WHY THEADVISER TO EXPLAIN WHY THE ECONOMY IS NOT AS STRONG ASECONOMY IS NOT AS STRONG AS TRUMP CLAIMS AND HOW THEY COULDTRUMP CLAIMS AND HOW THEY COULD MESSAGE THAT TO VOTERS.MESSAGE THAT TO VOTERS. WITH RECORD HIGH CONFIDENCEWITH RECORD HIGH CONFIDENCE LEVELS, AND IF I -- FIDELITY REPLEVELS, AND IF I -- FIDELITY REP THAT AVERAGE 401(K) ROSE 17%THAT AVERAGE 401(K) ROSE 17% LAST YEAR, HOW CAN SPEAKERLAST YEAR, HOW CAN SPEAKER PELOSI SAY THAT?PELOSI SAY THAT? >> THIS IS A FINISH GAS LIGHTING>> THIS IS A FINISH GAS LIGHTING OF AMERICANS.OF AMERICANS. YOU CANNOT MAKE THIS CASE WITH AYOU CANNOT MAKE THIS CASE WITH A STRAIGHT FACE.STRAIGHT FACE. I KNOW THAT SOME PEOPLE DON’TI KNOW THAT SOME PEOPLE DON’T LIKE PRESIDENT TRUMP PERSON --LIKE PRESIDENT TRUMP PERSON -- PERSONALLY, WHY NOT JUST GOPERSONALLY, WHY NOT JUST GO AFTER THAT, SAY ECONOMY IS DOINGAFTER THAT, SAY ECONOMY IS DOING WELL, WE’LL TAKE THE HIGH ROADWELL, WE’LL TAKE THE HIGH ROAD HERE WE’LL DOUBLE DOWN ONHERE WE’LL DOUBLE DOWN ON POLICIES BUT WITH CIVILITY ANDPOLICIES BUT WITH CIVILITY AND WORK ACROSS THE AISLE, THATWORK ACROSS THE AISLE, THAT WOULD BE HAVING INTEGRITY.WOULD BE HAVING INTEGRITY. BUT WHEN THE BOTTOM PORTIONS OFBUT WHEN THE BOTTOM PORTIONS OF AMERICANS DO BETTER THAN TOP INAMERICANS DO BETTER THAN TOP IN TERMS OF GROWTH, IN THEIRTERMS OF GROWTH, IN THEIR WEALTH, IN TERMS OFWEALTH, IN TERMS OF UNEMPLOYMENT, YOU FINANCIALLYUNEMPLOYMENT, YOU FINANCIALLY CANNOT MAKE THE CASE, UPCANNOT MAKE THE CASE, UP FORTUNATELY THE DEMOCRATS NEVERFORTUNATELY THE DEMOCRATS NEVER LEARN THAT.LEARN THAT. DAVID: JONATHAN.DAVID: JONATHAN. >> THEY ARE RUNNING AGAINST>> THEY ARE RUNNING AGAINST PROSPERITY?PROSPERITY? AWAY FROM PROSPERITY, TODAY WHATAWAY FROM PROSPERITY, TODAY WHAT DOMEDEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM?DOMEDEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM? THE AMERICAN PUBLIC IS SMARTERTHE AMERICAN PUBLIC IS SMARTER THAN THAT.THAN THAT. GOVERNMENT IS SMALLER AND LESSGOVERNMENT IS SMALLER AND LESS THE BETTER THE ECONOMY.THE BETTER THE ECONOMY. WHAT ARE THEY RUNNING ON?WHAT ARE THEY RUNNING ON? THEY CAN’T RUN ON A BAD ECONOMYTHEY CAN’T RUN ON A BAD ECONOMY SO THEY WILL RUN TO ON THE WHOLESO THEY WILL RUN TO ON THE WHOLE INEQUALITY THAT IS ONE ONE OF THINEQUALITY THAT IS ONE ONE OF TH CENTRAL BLANKS.CENTRAL BLANKS. >> AS A GENERAL RULE OF THUMB,>> AS A GENERAL RULE OF THUMB, WHEN THE ECONOMY IS BAD, YOUWHEN THE ECONOMY IS BAD, YOU DON’T NEED TO CALL A MEETING TODON’T NEED TO CALL A MEETING TO CONVINCE PEOPLE WHY IT IS BAD.CONVINCE PEOPLE WHY IT IS BAD. IT SHOW THEM A STA -- THEY KNOWIT SHOW THEM A STA -- THEY KNOW BECAUSE THEY DON’T HAVE JOBS,BECAUSE THEY DON’T HAVE JOBS, YOU KNOW.YOU KNOW. THE THE REASON DEMOCRATS ARE INTHE THE REASON DEMOCRATS ARE IN DEEP TROUBLE THIS FALL, THEYDEEP TROUBLE THIS FALL, THEY DON’T HAVE A MESSAGE THAT TALKSDON’T HAVE A MESSAGE THAT TALKS ABOUT THEIR CONFIDENCE INABOUT THEIR CONFIDENCE IN GOVERNING, THEY WANT TO CONVINCEGOVERNING, THEY WANT TO CONVINCE THAT YOU ECONOMY IS WORSE THANTHAT YOU ECONOMY IS WORSE THAN YOU THINK, I DON’T LIKE TO TRASHYOU THINK, I DON’T LIKE TO TRASH TALK THE ECONOMY, AND OTHERTALK THE ECONOMY, AND OTHER ARGUMENT THE PRESIDENT A NAUGHTYARGUMENT THE PRESIDENT A NAUGHTY BOY.BOY. ANYONE CONVINCED OF THAT ALREADYANYONE CONVINCED OF THAT ALREADY WILL NOT WIN NEW VOTE IRES.WILL NOT WIN NEW VOTE IRES. >> KANSAS CITY CHIEFS DID NOT>> KANSAS CITY CHIEFS DID NOT WIN SUPER BOWL IT WAS THE NEWWIN SUPER BOWL IT WAS THE NEW YORK GIANTS, I DON’T WANT TOYORK GIANTS, I DON’T WANT TO HEAR ANYTHING DIFFERENT.HEAR ANYTHING DIFFERENT. LET ME SAY, THE STOCK MARKET ISLET ME SAY, THE STOCK MARKET IS NOT UP 60 TO 80 PERCENT SINCENOT UP 60 TO 80 PERCENT SINCE ELECTION, WE’RE NOT 3. 6%ELECTION, WE’RE NOT 3. 6% UNEMPLOYMENT AND NOTE CREATED 7UNEMPLOYMENT AND NOTE CREATED 7 MILLION JOBS AND 7 MILLIONMILLION JOBS AND 7 MILLION PEOPLE HAVE NOT COME OFF WELFAREPEOPLE HAVE NOT COME OFF WELFARE IT IS TERRIBLE OUT THERE.IT IS TERRIBLE OUT THERE. HER JOB IS TO DO WHAT SHE ISHER JOB IS TO DO WHAT SHE IS DOING TO TRY TO CHANGE THEDOING TO TRY TO CHANGE THE PLAYING FIELD, AS WE HEAD TOPLAYING FIELD, AS WE HEAD TO ELECTIONTION.ELECTIONTION. IF IT IS TRUMP AGAINST BERNIEIF IT IS TRUMP AGAINST BERNIE SANDERS.SANDERS. OR ELIZABETH WARREN, OR ANYONEOR ELIZABETH WARREN, OR ANYONE ELSE IN THE ECONOMY STILL INELSE IN THE ECONOMY STILL IN GREAT SHAPE, TRUMP WILL WIN.GREAT SHAPE, TRUMP WILL WIN. DAVID: JONATHAN.DAVID: JONATHAN. JACK WAS TALKING ABOUTJACK WAS TALKING ABOUT CONFIDENCE IN GOVERNANCE, ICONFIDENCE IN GOVERNANCE, I WORRY ABOUT CONFIDENCE INWORRY ABOUT CONFIDENCE IN BUSINESS SECTOR, I HAVE NOTBUSINESS SECTOR, I HAVE NOT HEARD ANY DEMOCRAT CANDIDATEHEARD ANY DEMOCRAT CANDIDATE TALKS ABOUT HOW HE WILL GROW THETALKS ABOUT HOW HE WILL GROW THE PRIVATE SECTOR IT IS ALL ABOUTPRIVATE SECTOR IT IS ALL ABOUT GROWING THE GOVERNMENT.GROWING THE GOVERNMENT. >> DEMOCRAT THINK THAT BY AND>> DEMOCRAT THINK THAT BY AND LARGE GOVERNMENT IS THE SOURCELARGE GOVERNMENT IS THE SOURCE OF WEALTH CREATION.OF WEALTH CREATION. THEY HAVE A PLAN FOR THAT INTHEY HAVE A PLAN FOR THAT IN EDUCATION, AND HOUSING ANDEDUCATION, AND HOUSING AND HEALTHCARE.HEALTHCARE. AND IN ENERGY, DEMOCRATS HAVE AAND IN ENERGY, DEMOCRATS HAVE A BIG GOVERNMENT PROGRAM FOR WELLBIG GOVERNMENT PROGRAM FOR WELL THE OF THE -- ELEMENT OF THE ECOTHE OF THE -- ELEMENT OF THE ECO WE KNOW HISTORY, MOST FREEWE KNOW HISTORY, MOST FREE ECONOMIES ARE MOST PROSPEROUS.ECONOMIES ARE MOST PROSPEROUS. >> AND -->> AND -- >> EVERYTHING THAT -->> EVERYTHING THAT -- >> CAROLL.>> CAROLL. >> EVERYTHING THAT THE>> EVERYTHING THAT THE GOVERNMENT GETS INVOLVED WITH ISGOVERNMENT GETS INVOLVED WITH IS MORE EXPENSIVE.MORE EXPENSIVE. SOMETHING LIKE EDUCATION, SINCESOMETHING LIKE EDUCATION, SINCE GOVERNMENT HAS GOTTEN MOREGOVERNMENT HAS GOTTEN MORE INVOLVED, THE COSTS HAVE GONEINVOLVED, THE COSTS HAVE GONE UP, THEIR CASE, THEY CAN’T MAKEUP, THEIR CASE, THEY CAN’T MAKE THEIR OWN CASE, NUMBERS DON’TTHEIR OWN CASE, NUMBERS DON’T SUPPORT IT.SUPPORT IT. DAVID: MORE EXPENSE EXPIF MORE

Dems target Trump's economy after impeachment fail

View online
< ?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><>
<text sub="clublinks" start="7.174" dur="0.934">DAVID: DEMOCRAT HOPE TO EXTENT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="8.142" dur="1.567">DAVID: DEMOCRAT HOPE TO EXTENT THEIR HAND AFTER IMPEACHMENT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="9.711" dur="2.4">THEIR HAND AFTER IMPEACHMENT FAILED CAPITOL HILL, REPORTING</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="12.113" dur="1.734">FAILED CAPITOL HILL, REPORTING THAT SPEAKER PELOSI LOOKING FOR</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="13.881" dur="3.836">THAT SPEAKER PELOSI LOOKING FOR HER NEXT ATTACK, HOSTING A</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="17.752" dur="1.8">HER NEXT ATTACK, HOSTING A SPECIAL SPEAKER’S MEETING</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="19.587" dur="2.602">SPECIAL SPEAKER’S MEETING TUESDAY WITH TOP OBAMA ECONOMIC</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="22.19" dur="3.936">TUESDAY WITH TOP OBAMA ECONOMIC ADVISER TO EXPLAIN WHY THE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="26.161" dur="1.366">ADVISER TO EXPLAIN WHY THE ECONOMY IS NOT AS STRONG AS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="27.528" dur="1.701">ECONOMY IS NOT AS STRONG AS TRUMP CLAIMS AND HOW THEY COULD</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="29.23" dur="1.4">TRUMP CLAIMS AND HOW THEY COULD MESSAGE THAT TO VOTERS.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="30.631" dur="2.034">MESSAGE THAT TO VOTERS. WITH RECORD HIGH CONFIDENCE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="32.7" dur="6.839">WITH RECORD HIGH CONFIDENCE LEVELS, AND IF I -- FIDELITY REP</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="39.54" dur="1.901">LEVELS, AND IF I -- FIDELITY REP THAT AVERAGE 401(K) ROSE 17%</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="41.442" dur="3.87">THAT AVERAGE 401(K) ROSE 17% LAST YEAR, HOW CAN SPEAKER</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="45.313" dur="1.701">LAST YEAR, HOW CAN SPEAKER PELOSI SAY THAT?</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="47.015" dur="2.301">PELOSI SAY THAT? >> THIS IS A FINISH GAS LIGHTING</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="49.317" dur="1.133">>> THIS IS A FINISH GAS LIGHTING OF AMERICANS.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="50.485" dur="2.534">OF AMERICANS. YOU CANNOT MAKE THIS CASE WITH A</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="53.054" dur="0.6">YOU CANNOT MAKE THIS CASE WITH A STRAIGHT FACE.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="53.688" dur="1.901">STRAIGHT FACE. I KNOW THAT SOME PEOPLE DON’T</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="55.623" dur="3.803">I KNOW THAT SOME PEOPLE DON’T LIKE PRESIDENT TRUMP PERSON --</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="59.427" dur="1.534">LIKE PRESIDENT TRUMP PERSON -- PERSONALLY, WHY NOT JUST GO</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="60.995" dur="2.969">PERSONALLY, WHY NOT JUST GO AFTER THAT, SAY ECONOMY IS DOING</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="63.965" dur="1.701">AFTER THAT, SAY ECONOMY IS DOING WELL, WE’LL TAKE THE HIGH ROAD</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="65.667" dur="2.701">WELL, WE’LL TAKE THE HIGH ROAD HERE WE’LL DOUBLE DOWN ON</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="68.37" dur="1.7">HERE WE’LL DOUBLE DOWN ON POLICIES BUT WITH CIVILITY AND</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="70.071" dur="1.567">POLICIES BUT WITH CIVILITY AND WORK ACROSS THE AISLE, THAT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="71.673" dur="2.168">WORK ACROSS THE AISLE, THAT WOULD BE HAVING INTEGRITY.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="73.842" dur="1.333">WOULD BE HAVING INTEGRITY. BUT WHEN THE BOTTOM PORTIONS OF</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="75.21" dur="2">BUT WHEN THE BOTTOM PORTIONS OF AMERICANS DO BETTER THAN TOP IN</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="77.245" dur="2.201">AMERICANS DO BETTER THAN TOP IN TERMS OF GROWTH, IN THEIR</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="79.447" dur="2.034">TERMS OF GROWTH, IN THEIR WEALTH, IN TERMS OF</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="81.483" dur="1.5">WEALTH, IN TERMS OF UNEMPLOYMENT, YOU FINANCIALLY</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="82.985" dur="1.266">UNEMPLOYMENT, YOU FINANCIALLY CANNOT MAKE THE CASE, UP</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="84.252" dur="1.834">CANNOT MAKE THE CASE, UP FORTUNATELY THE DEMOCRATS NEVER</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="86.121" dur="0.732">FORTUNATELY THE DEMOCRATS NEVER LEARN THAT.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="86.888" dur="0.466">LEARN THAT. DAVID: JONATHAN.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="87.355" dur="2.635">DAVID: JONATHAN. >> THEY ARE RUNNING AGAINST</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="89.991" dur="0.666">>> THEY ARE RUNNING AGAINST PROSPERITY?</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="90.659" dur="2.835">PROSPERITY? AWAY FROM PROSPERITY, TODAY WHAT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="93.529" dur="3.568">AWAY FROM PROSPERITY, TODAY WHAT DOMEDEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM?</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="97.099" dur="2.133">DOMEDEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM? THE AMERICAN PUBLIC IS SMARTER</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="99.267" dur="2.735">THE AMERICAN PUBLIC IS SMARTER THAN THAT.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="102.003" dur="2.402">THAN THAT. GOVERNMENT IS SMALLER AND LESS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="104.439" dur="1.701">GOVERNMENT IS SMALLER AND LESS THE BETTER THE ECONOMY.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="106.174" dur="2.101">THE BETTER THE ECONOMY. WHAT ARE THEY RUNNING ON?</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="108.276" dur="2.435">WHAT ARE THEY RUNNING ON? THEY CAN’T RUN ON A BAD ECONOMY</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="110.745" dur="4.604">THEY CAN’T RUN ON A BAD ECONOMY SO THEY WILL RUN TO ON THE WHOLE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="115.384" dur="9.141">SO THEY WILL RUN TO ON THE WHOLE INEQUALITY THAT IS ONE ONE OF TH</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="124.526" dur="1.067">INEQUALITY THAT IS ONE ONE OF TH CENTRAL BLANKS.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="125.594" dur="2.401">CENTRAL BLANKS. >> AS A GENERAL RULE OF THUMB,</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="127.996" dur="2.235">>> AS A GENERAL RULE OF THUMB, WHEN THE ECONOMY IS BAD, YOU</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="130.232" dur="2.702">WHEN THE ECONOMY IS BAD, YOU DON’T NEED TO CALL A MEETING TO</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="132.968" dur="1.968">DON’T NEED TO CALL A MEETING TO CONVINCE PEOPLE WHY IT IS BAD.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="134.937" dur="6.138">CONVINCE PEOPLE WHY IT IS BAD. IT SHOW THEM A STA -- THEY KNOW</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="141.11" dur="1.333">IT SHOW THEM A STA -- THEY KNOW BECAUSE THEY DON’T HAVE JOBS,</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="142.445" dur="1.099">BECAUSE THEY DON’T HAVE JOBS, YOU KNOW.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="143.545" dur="3.569">YOU KNOW. THE THE REASON DEMOCRATS ARE IN</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="147.116" dur="1.5">THE THE REASON DEMOCRATS ARE IN DEEP TROUBLE THIS FALL, THEY</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="148.618" dur="1.5">DEEP TROUBLE THIS FALL, THEY DON’T HAVE A MESSAGE THAT TALKS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="150.119" dur="3.035">DON’T HAVE A MESSAGE THAT TALKS ABOUT THEIR CONFIDENCE IN</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="153.189" dur="1.567">ABOUT THEIR CONFIDENCE IN GOVERNING, THEY WANT TO CONVINCE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="154.757" dur="1.2">GOVERNING, THEY WANT TO CONVINCE THAT YOU ECONOMY IS WORSE THAN</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="155.958" dur="4.003">THAT YOU ECONOMY IS WORSE THAN YOU THINK, I DON’T LIKE TO TRASH</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="159.962" dur="2.034">YOU THINK, I DON’T LIKE TO TRASH TALK THE ECONOMY, AND OTHER</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="162.031" dur="3.102">TALK THE ECONOMY, AND OTHER ARGUMENT THE PRESIDENT A NAUGHTY</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="165.134" dur="0.433">ARGUMENT THE PRESIDENT A NAUGHTY BOY.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="165.601" dur="1.067">BOY. ANYONE CONVINCED OF THAT ALREADY</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="166.669" dur="1.8">ANYONE CONVINCED OF THAT ALREADY WILL NOT WIN NEW VOTE IRES.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="168.471" dur="1.466">WILL NOT WIN NEW VOTE IRES. >> KANSAS CITY CHIEFS DID NOT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="169.972" dur="1.2">>> KANSAS CITY CHIEFS DID NOT WIN SUPER BOWL IT WAS THE NEW</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="171.173" dur="1.267">WIN SUPER BOWL IT WAS THE NEW YORK GIANTS, I DON’T WANT TO</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="172.441" dur="3.936">YORK GIANTS, I DON’T WANT TO HEAR ANYTHING DIFFERENT.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="176.412" dur="2.568">HEAR ANYTHING DIFFERENT. LET ME SAY, THE STOCK MARKET IS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="178.981" dur="2.702">LET ME SAY, THE STOCK MARKET IS NOT UP 60 TO 80 PERCENT SINCE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="181.684" dur="2.335">NOT UP 60 TO 80 PERCENT SINCE ELECTION, WE’RE NOT 3. 6%</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="184.053" dur="1.734">ELECTION, WE’RE NOT 3. 6% UNEMPLOYMENT AND NOTE CREATED 7</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="185.821" dur="1.367">UNEMPLOYMENT AND NOTE CREATED 7 MILLION JOBS AND 7 MILLION</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="187.189" dur="1.467">MILLION JOBS AND 7 MILLION PEOPLE HAVE NOT COME OFF WELFARE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="188.691" dur="2.101">PEOPLE HAVE NOT COME OFF WELFARE IT IS TERRIBLE OUT THERE.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="190.826" dur="2.469">IT IS TERRIBLE OUT THERE. HER JOB IS TO DO WHAT SHE IS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="193.296" dur="1.334">HER JOB IS TO DO WHAT SHE IS DOING TO TRY TO CHANGE THE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="194.664" dur="1.834">DOING TO TRY TO CHANGE THE PLAYING FIELD, AS WE HEAD TO</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="196.533" dur="3.568">PLAYING FIELD, AS WE HEAD TO ELECTIONTION.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="200.103" dur="2.334">ELECTIONTION. IF IT IS TRUMP AGAINST BERNIE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="202.471" dur="0.333">IF IT IS TRUMP AGAINST BERNIE SANDERS.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="202.805" dur="1.601">SANDERS. OR ELIZABETH WARREN, OR ANYONE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="204.407" dur="1.767">OR ELIZABETH WARREN, OR ANYONE ELSE IN THE ECONOMY STILL IN</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="206.175" dur="2.435">ELSE IN THE ECONOMY STILL IN GREAT SHAPE, TRUMP WILL WIN.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="208.611" dur="2.502">GREAT SHAPE, TRUMP WILL WIN. DAVID: JONATHAN.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="211.114" dur="1.567">DAVID: JONATHAN. JACK WAS TALKING ABOUT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="212.682" dur="2.701">JACK WAS TALKING ABOUT CONFIDENCE IN GOVERNANCE, I</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="215.385" dur="0.933">CONFIDENCE IN GOVERNANCE, I WORRY ABOUT CONFIDENCE IN</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="216.352" dur="1">WORRY ABOUT CONFIDENCE IN BUSINESS SECTOR, I HAVE NOT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="217.387" dur="1.834">BUSINESS SECTOR, I HAVE NOT HEARD ANY DEMOCRAT CANDIDATE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="219.256" dur="3.035">HEARD ANY DEMOCRAT CANDIDATE TALKS ABOUT HOW HE WILL GROW THE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="222.325" dur="1.6">TALKS ABOUT HOW HE WILL GROW THE PRIVATE SECTOR IT IS ALL ABOUT</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="223.927" dur="0.699">PRIVATE SECTOR IT IS ALL ABOUT GROWING THE GOVERNMENT.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="224.627" dur="1.501">GROWING THE GOVERNMENT. >> DEMOCRAT THINK THAT BY AND</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="226.162" dur="2.402">>> DEMOCRAT THINK THAT BY AND LARGE GOVERNMENT IS THE SOURCE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="228.598" dur="1.634">LARGE GOVERNMENT IS THE SOURCE OF WEALTH CREATION.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="230.233" dur="1.767">OF WEALTH CREATION. THEY HAVE A PLAN FOR THAT IN</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="232.001" dur="2.134">THEY HAVE A PLAN FOR THAT IN EDUCATION, AND HOUSING AND</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="234.137" dur="0.399">EDUCATION, AND HOUSING AND HEALTHCARE.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="234.537" dur="1.801">HEALTHCARE. AND IN ENERGY, DEMOCRATS HAVE A</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="236.372" dur="2.068">AND IN ENERGY, DEMOCRATS HAVE A BIG GOVERNMENT PROGRAM FOR WELL</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="238.441" dur="3.736">BIG GOVERNMENT PROGRAM FOR WELL THE OF THE -- ELEMENT OF THE ECO</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="242.212" dur="3.335">THE OF THE -- ELEMENT OF THE ECO WE KNOW HISTORY, MOST FREE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="245.582" dur="2.267">WE KNOW HISTORY, MOST FREE ECONOMIES ARE MOST PROSPEROUS.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="247.851" dur="1.367">ECONOMIES ARE MOST PROSPEROUS. >> AND --</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="249.252" dur="1.067">>> AND -- >> EVERYTHING THAT --</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="250.32" dur="0.332">>> EVERYTHING THAT -- >> CAROLL.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="250.687" dur="1.533">>> CAROLL. >> EVERYTHING THAT THE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="252.255" dur="2.101">>> EVERYTHING THAT THE GOVERNMENT GETS INVOLVED WITH IS</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="254.357" dur="1.467">GOVERNMENT GETS INVOLVED WITH IS MORE EXPENSIVE.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="255.825" dur="1.734">MORE EXPENSIVE. SOMETHING LIKE EDUCATION, SINCE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="257.593" dur="1.935">SOMETHING LIKE EDUCATION, SINCE GOVERNMENT HAS GOTTEN MORE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="259.562" dur="1.467">GOVERNMENT HAS GOTTEN MORE INVOLVED, THE COSTS HAVE GONE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="261.031" dur="1.533">INVOLVED, THE COSTS HAVE GONE UP, THEIR CASE, THEY CAN’T MAKE</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="262.599" dur="1.333">UP, THEIR CASE, THEY CAN’T MAKE THEIR OWN CASE, NUMBERS DON’T</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="263.967" dur="0.499">THEIR OWN CASE, NUMBERS DON’T SUPPORT IT.</text>
<text sub="clublinks" start="264.501" dur="1.3">SUPPORT IT. DAVID: MORE EXPENSE EXPIF MORE</text>